Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 1 to 10 of 736 results.
  • Jurisprudence non-judicial mechanisms

    Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK)

    Country
    Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK)
    Keywords
    Enslavement Forced Abortion Murder Rape, Torture

    Reference link
    http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/CoIDPRK/Pages/CommissionInquiryonHRinDPRK.aspx
    Research focus
    Investigation, Prosecution and Prevention of Conflict related Sexual Violence
    Type of mechanism
    Commission of Inquiry
    Name of mechanism
    Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK)
    Status
    2715
    Findings
    On 17 February 2014, the COI reported on its findings and established that a wide array of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence, arising from “policies established at the highest level of State,” had been committed and continue to take place in the DPRK and called for urgent action by the international community to address the human rights situation in the country, including referral to the International Criminal Court. The report cites many incidents of sexual violence, which the COI finds to rise to the level of crimes against humanity. For example, it is stated that: “Although not endorsed as general policy and contrary to prison regulations, the frequent incidences of rape form part of the overall pattern of crimes against humanity. Like in the political prison camps, cases of rape are a direct consequence of the impunity and unchecked power that prison guards and other officials enjoy. The forced abortions to which pregnant inmates have been subjected constitute a form of sexual violence of a gravity that meets the threshold required for crimes against humanity.” Also, it is held that the State systematically uses violence and punishment to deter its citizens from exercising their human right to leave the country. Persons who are forcibly repatriated from China are commonly subjected to torture, arbitrary detention, summary execution, forced abortion and other forms of sexual violence. According to the COI these crimes can be qualified as crimes against humanity and include extermination, murder, enslavement, torture, imprisonment, rape, forced abortions and other sexual violence, persecution on political, religious, racial and gender grounds, the forcible transfer of populations, the enforced disappearance of persons and the inhumane act of knowingly causing prolonged starvation. The commission further finds that crimes against humanity are ongoing in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea because the policies, institutions and patterns of impunity that lie at their heart remain in place.
    Recommendations
    The COI recommends specifically on sexual violence: (1) to take immediate measures to ensure gender equality in practice, such as by providing equal access for women in public life and employment; eradicate discriminatory laws, regulations and practices affecting women; take measures to address all forms of violence against women, including domestic violence, sexual and gender-based violence by State agents and/or within State institutions; and respond immediately and effectively to trafficking in women, and address the structural causes that make women vulnerable to such violations; and (2) abolish the de facto prohibition on foreign travel imposed on ordinary citizens; decriminalize illegal border crossings and introduce border controls that conform to international standards; renounce orders to shoot and kill at the border; cease to regard citizens repatriated from China as political criminals or to subject them to imprisonment, execution, torture, arbitrary detention, deliberate starvation, illegal cavity searches, forced abortions and other sexual violence; and abolish the State’s compulsory designation of places of residence and employment, as well as the requirement to obtain a permit for domestic travel outside a person’s designated province.
    Date of report / release
    1914-02-17

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina - Ivan Hrkac

    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Accused at large Sexual Violence, Torture Prisoners of War Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Forced Sexual Intercourse

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/989/Hrka%C4%8D/
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Preliminary Hearing Judge)
    Name of accused
    Ivan Hrkac
    Charges
    The Indictment (of 27 December 2007) alleges that, from May 1993 to July 1993, as a member of the HVO Convicts Battalion, Hrkac inflicted severe physical and mental pain on prisoners of war, members of the Army of RBiH. According to the Indictment, Hrkac treated the detained Bosniak civilians in an inhumane manner, tortured them and forced them to sexual intercourse. Hrkac is charged in the indictment with the following crimes: - War Crimes against Civilians pursuant to Article 173(1) of the Criminal Code of BiH (CC BiH) in conjunction with the following items: c) Killings, intentional infliction of severe physical or mental pain or suffering upon a person (torture), inhuman treatment, and e) Unlawful bringing in concentration camps and other illegal arrests and detention. - War Crimes against Prisoners of War pursuant to Article 175(1) of the CC BiH in conjunction with the following item: a) depriving other persons of their life (murders), intentional infliction of severe physical or mental pain or suffering upon persons (tortures), inhuman treatment. All in conjunction with Article 29 (Accomplices) and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH (individual criminal responsibility).Although it is not entirely clear under which charges the sexual violence is brought, this is likely under torture and/or inhuman treatment as war crimes.The indictment was confirmed on 9 January 2008.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    S1 1 K 002907 07 KRO (X-KR-06/170)

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Askraba Dordislav

    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Rape Sexual Violence Enforced Disappearance Rape Camps Torture Rape as a Weapon of War War Crimes Crimes Against Humanity

    Reference link
    http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/predmet/2463/show
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Ratko Bundalo, Nedo Zeljaja, Dordislav Askraba
    Charges
    Ratko Bundalo and Nedo Zeljaja were charged with the criminal offense of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172 (1) (h) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CC BiH) in conjunction with the following items:a) depriving another person of his life (murder),b) extermination,d) deportation or forcible transfer of population,e) imprisonment,f) torture,g) sexual violence, andk) other inhumane acts,in conjunction with Article 173 (1) (c), (e) and (f) of the CC BiH, all in conjunction with Article 180 (1) of the CC BiH.Dordislav Askraba is charged with the criminal offense of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172 (1) (h) of the CC BiH in conjunction with the following items:a) depriving another person of his life (murder),e) imprisonment,f) torture, andk) other inhumane actsin conjunction with Article 180 (1) of CC BiH.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 21 December 2009, the Trial Panel reached the first-instance verdict finding the accused, Ratko Bundalo and Nedo Zeljaja guilty of crimes against humanity. The accused Ratko Bundalo was sentenced to 19 years of imprisonment, the accused Nedo Zeljaja was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment, and the accused Dordislav Askraba was acquitted on all counts of the Indictment.
    sentencing
    The Trial Chamber sentenced Ratko Bundalo to 19 years of imprisonment and Nedo Zeljaja to 15 years of imprisonment. The Appeals Chamber found Dordislav Askraba guilty of war crimes and sentenced him to 7 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 18 April 2012, the Panel of the Appellate pronounced the second instance verdict finding the accused Dordislav Askraba guilty of war crimes against civilians, committed in the manner described in the operative provision of the verdict, in violation of Article 142(1) of the Criminal Code of SFRY as adopted pursuant to the Law on Application of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Criminal Code of the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia, in conjunction with Articles 22 and 24 of the same Code. The verdict sentenced the accused to imprisonment of 7 years.Following new appeals by the of Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Defense Counsel for the Accused Dordislav Askraba, the Appeals Chamber upheld the second-instance verdict on 18 June 2013.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    S1 1 K 005159 11 Kzz

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Coric Nedzad et al.

    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Rape Camps Rape Rape/Sexual Violence in Prison

    Reference link
    http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/predmet/3718/show
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Nedzad Coric, Jure Kordic, Drazen Lovric, Dario Susac, Nedzad Tinjak, Nuhan Sikalo, Dario Mihalj, Stanko Skobic, Tomislav Ancic, Marinko Sunjic, Slavko Golemac
    Charges
    The Indictment charged the accused with the commission of the following criminal offenses: Nedzad Coric, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs e) and g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Jure Kordic, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs e), a) and f) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Drazen Lovric, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph e) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Dario Susac, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs e), f) and g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Nedzad Tinjak, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs e), k), f) and g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Nuhan Sikalo, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Dario Mihalj, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs g) and f) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Stanko Skobic, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph e) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Tomislav Anci, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Marinko Sunjic, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Slavko Golemac, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph e) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    S1 1 K 027427 18 Kri

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Milisavljevic Predrag et al.

    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Enforced Disappearance Rape Torture Military Perpetrator Crimes Against Humanity

    Reference link
    http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/predmet/3013/show
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Milisavljevic Predrag, Pantelic Milos, Tasic Ljubomir
    Charges
    Crimes Against Humanity pursuant to Article 172 CC BiH, in conjunction with Article 180(1) CC of BiH.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 28 October 2018, the Trial Panel of the Section I for War Crimes of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found Predrag Milisavljevic and Milos Pantelic guilty of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1) (h) as read with (a) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Accused were sentenced to imprisonment of 20 years each. Predrag Milisavljevic was furthermore acquitted of the charges of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), as read with (f) and (g) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina, all in conjunction with Article 180(1) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Milos Pantelic was also acquitted of the charges of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h) as read with (e), (f), (h) and (k) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The trial Chamber acquitted Predrag Milisavljevic, Milos Pantelic and Ljubomir Tasic of the charges of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h) as read with (d) and (e) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    sentencing
    The Trial Chamber sentenced Predrag Milisavljevic to 20 years imprisonment and acquitted Ljubomir Tasic of all charges. The Appeals Chamber sentenced Milos Pantelic to 15 years imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 23 July 2015, the Appellate Division Panel of Section I for War Crimes of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina sent out the second-instance verdict of 2 June 2015 in the case of Predrag Milisavljevic et al., which, in their entirety, refused the appeals filed by the Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina and by defense counsel for the accused Predrag Milisavljevic. The appeal filed by defense counsel for the accused Milos Pantelic was however, partly granted. Milos Pantelic, concerning the criminal offense of crimes against humanity, was accordingly sentenced to 15 (fifteen) years of imprisonment. The remaining part of the first-instance verdict was upheld.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    S1 1 K 011128 12 Krz

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Nenad Perovic

    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Rape Military Perpetrator Gender-Based Persecution Sexual Violence

    Reference link
    http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/predmet/3797/show
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Nenad Perovic
    Charges
    crimes against humanity under Article 172(1)(a) of the CC BiH
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    S1 1 K 026601 18 Kri

  • Literature

    Dolan, Chris - Addressing Sexual Violence against Men and Boys in Conflict

    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men
    Country
    Syria, Libya, Central African Republic (CAR), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
    Keywords
    Sexual Violence against Men/Boys Rape NGO Prevention Survivor

    Reference link
    https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Into_The_Mainstream-Addressing_Sexual_Violence_against_Men_and_Boys_in_Conflict.pdf
    Full reference
    Dolan, Chris, "Into the mainstream: Addressing sexual violence against men and boys in conflict", A briefing paper prepared for the workshop held at the Overseas Development Institute, London, 14 May 2014
    Type of literature
    Grey Literature
    Research focus
    Gaps in the Jurisprudence and Legislation on Conflict-related Sexual Violence crimes
    Author
    Dolan, Chris

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    DRC Military Operational Court – Sheka Case

    Country
    Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
    Keywords
    Mass Rape Sexual Slavery Sexual Violence against Girls Child Soldiers

    Reference link
    http://www.hrw.org/news/2018/11/29/dr-congo-mass-rape-trial-crucial-justice
    Type of mechanism
    Military Tribunal
    Name of accused
    Ntabo Ntaberi “Sheka”
    Charges
    Crimes against humanity, war crimes, terrorism
    Status
    2778

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ECCC - Ao An

    Country
    Cambodia
    Keywords
    Forced Marriage Rape

    Reference link
    http://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/case/topic/1691
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
    Name of accused
    Ao An
    Charges
    In the indictment of 14 March 2016, Ao An was charged with: (1) Genocide of the Cham.(2) Crimes against Humanity, namely murder; extermination; enslavement; imprisonment; torture; persecution against the so-called “17 April people”, former Lon Nol soldiers, Central (Old North) Zone cadres, their families and subordinates, people from the East Zone, and other “bad elements” and “internal enemies”; persecution against Cham and Vietnamese people; and other inhumane acts including forced marriage, rape, enforced disappearances, physical abuse, forced labour, and inhumane conditions of detention. (3) Violations of the 1956 Cambodian Penal Code, namely premeditated homicide.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    004/02

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ECCC - Im Chaem

    Country
    Cambodia
    Keywords
    Crimes Against Humanity Forced Marriage Sexual Violence

    Reference link
    https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/case/topic/case0401
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
    Name of accused
    Im Chaem
    Charges
    Im Chaem was initially charged with crimes against humanity and violations of the 1956 Penal Code. Additional allegations were however submitted in five supplementary submissions filed which included allegations of Forced Marriage and Sexual Violence.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    004/1

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).