Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 21 to 23 of 23 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Milisavljevic Predrag et al.

    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Enforced Disappearance Rape Torture Military Perpetrator Crimes Against Humanity

    Reference link
    http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/predmet/3013/show
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Milisavljevic Predrag, Pantelic Milos, Tasic Ljubomir
    Charges
    Crimes Against Humanity pursuant to Article 172 CC BiH, in conjunction with Article 180(1) CC of BiH.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 28 October 2018, the Trial Panel of the Section I for War Crimes of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found Predrag Milisavljevic and Milos Pantelic guilty of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1) (h) as read with (a) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Accused were sentenced to imprisonment of 20 years each. Predrag Milisavljevic was furthermore acquitted of the charges of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), as read with (f) and (g) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina, all in conjunction with Article 180(1) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Milos Pantelic was also acquitted of the charges of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h) as read with (e), (f), (h) and (k) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The trial Chamber acquitted Predrag Milisavljevic, Milos Pantelic and Ljubomir Tasic of the charges of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h) as read with (d) and (e) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    sentencing
    The Trial Chamber sentenced Predrag Milisavljevic to 20 years imprisonment and acquitted Ljubomir Tasic of all charges. The Appeals Chamber sentenced Milos Pantelic to 15 years imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 23 July 2015, the Appellate Division Panel of Section I for War Crimes of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina sent out the second-instance verdict of 2 June 2015 in the case of Predrag Milisavljevic et al., which, in their entirety, refused the appeals filed by the Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina and by defense counsel for the accused Predrag Milisavljevic. The appeal filed by defense counsel for the accused Milos Pantelic was however, partly granted. Milos Pantelic, concerning the criminal offense of crimes against humanity, was accordingly sentenced to 15 (fifteen) years of imprisonment. The remaining part of the first-instance verdict was upheld.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    S1 1 K 011128 12 Krz

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICC - Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo "Bemba Case"

    Country
    Central African Republic (CAR)
    Keywords
    Rape Torture Reparation

    Reference link
    http://www.icc-cpi.int/car/bemba#17
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Court
    Name of accused
    Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo
    Charges
    (1) Two counts of crimes against humanity namely murder and rape; and (2) Three counts of war crimes: murder, rape and pillaging
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 21 March 2016, the Trial Chamber convicted Mr Bemba for the crimes against humanity of murder and rape and the war crimes of murder, rape and pillaging committed by troops of the Mouvement de libération du Congo (“MLC”) in the Central African Republic from on or about 26 October 2002 to 15 March 2003. It found that Mr Bemba, was criminally responsible for these crimes under article 28(a) of the Statute as a result of effectively acting as a military commander and having effective control over the MLC troops.
    sentencing
    On 21 June 2016, Bemba was sentenced to 18 years of imprisonment by the Trial Chamber III. Following Mr. Bemba’s successful appeal against the decision of the Trial Chamber III, the Appeal’s Chamber dismissed Mr Bemba’s appeal against this sentence as moot.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Mr Bemba filed an appeal against both the judgment and the sentence against him on 4 April 2016 and the appeals hearing took place from 9 to 11 January 2018. On 8 June 2018, the Appeals Chamber, by majority, concluded, that the trial of Bemba was not within the scope of the case. In a summary of its decision, the Appeals Chamber stated that: “the Trial Chamber’s conclusion that Mr Bemba failed to take all necessary and reasonable measures in response to MLC crimes in the CAR, was materially affected by errors and that Mr Bemba cannot be held criminally liable under article 28 for the crimes committed by MLC troops during the CAR operation.” The Chamber also noted in its judgment that “The Pre-Trial Chamber did not enter findings that there were substantial grounds to believe that specific acts of murder, rape and pillaging had been committed, but rather “relied on” or “drew attention, in particular” to certain events and evidence to support its overall conclusions.” Accordingly, the Chamber acquitted Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo from the charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICC-01/05-01/08

  • Jurisprudence non-judicial mechanisms

    Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission

    Country
    Peru
    Keywords
    Forced Prostitution Forced Pregnancy Forced Nudity Rape Torture

    Research focus
    Inequality and Discrimination against Women during Armed Conflict
    Type of mechanism
    Truth Commission
    Name of mechanism
    Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission
    Status
    2715
    Findings
    The TRC found that cases of sexual violence against women were significantly rarer than those of other human rights violations. As in South Africa, however, victims’ feelings of guilt and shame may have led to underreporting. Another reason for the underrepresentation was that much of the sexual violence occurred in the context of other human rights violations, such as massacres, arbitrary detentions, summary executions, and torture. Such abuses tend to overshadow cases of sexual violence, even where the sexual violence can be discerned. The TRC found no evidence of criminal prosecutions of members of the army or the police who committed sexual abuses; nor did it uncover information indicating that complaints filed by victims of sexual violence had been investigated. Sexually abused women often were discriminated against by their own communities and families. This hostile environment made it very difficult for victims to denounce the crimes.
    Recommendations
    It recommended that women who assumed leadership roles during the armed conflict should be recognized appropriately. Concerning health reparations, the TRC suggested that the state should identify the specific needs of women, especially in mental health. It also recommended that the impact of violence in families and gender relationships should be identified.
    Date of report / release
    1903-08-28
    Reparations / awards
    The final report included a comprehensive plan of reparations (PIR) for victims of the violence. The TRC recognized the importance of the gender perspective in the PIR and the need for equal participation of men and women in its implementation. The PIR included symbolic reparations like public gestures, acts of acknowledgement, memorials, and sites of memory. The TRC urged that abuses and crimes against women should be explicitly mentioned in all such events. Finally, the TRC proposed economic reparations for victims of rape and children born as a result of rape.

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).