Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database
A collection of relevant literature and case law
Showing 11 to 20 of 22 results.
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Hazim Delic (Mucic et al."Celebici Camp")
- Year
- 2003
- Issues
- Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Akayesu Torture Superior Responsibility Camp Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/676/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Hazim Delic
- Charges
- - Torture as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (committing) for the rape of Grozdana Cecez and for multiple rapes of Milojka Antic (Witness A). - Other sexual violence charges charged under Article 7(3)
- Trial chamber verdict
- Delic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 16 November 1998 of: - Torture as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime Delic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - All the other sexual violence charges for which he was charged under Article 7(3) as the Prosecution failed to prove that Delic had superior responsibility over Celebici prison-camp, i.e. for the multiple rapes of Grozdana Cecez and Milojka Antic (i.e. cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime); for placing a burning fuse cord around the genital areas of two detainees (i.e. willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime); and for forcing detainees to commit fellatio on each other (i.e. inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime).
- sentencing
- Delic was sentenced to 18 years of imprisonment on 8 April 2003.
- Appeals chamber verdict
- The Appeals Chamber on 20 February 2001 stated that “multiple criminal convictions entered under different statutory provisions but based on the same conduct are permissible only if each statutory provision involved has a materially distinct element not contained in the other.” For this reason, it reversed the Trial Chamber’s conviction for torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime, but upheld the torture as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime conviction for the rape of Grozdana Cecez and for multiple rapes of Milojka Antic (Witness A).
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-96-21
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Dusko Tadic (“Prijedor”)
- Year
- 2000
- Issues
- Sexual Violence against Men
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Forced Oral Sex Mutilation Insufficient Evidence Gang Rape Aiding and Abetting Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/787/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Dusko Tadic
- Charges
- - Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) (individual responsibility) (aiding and abetting) for forcing two prisoners to commit oral sexual acts and for forcing one prisoner to sexually mutilate another prisoner.- Persecution as a crime against humanity as far as the sexual violence crimes were concerned.
- Trial chamber verdict
- Tadic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 7 May 1997 of:- Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as crimes against humanity Tadic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of:- Persecution as a crime against humanity as far as the sexual violence crimes were concerned. According to the Trial Chamber there was insufficient evidence regarding Tadic’s participation in sexual assault and torture inflicted through gang-rapes.
- sentencing
- Tadic was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment on 26 January 2000.
- Appeals chamber verdict
- The Appeals Chamber found Tadic on 15 July 1999 additionally guilty of: - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime under Article 7(1) (individual responsibility) (aiding and abetting) for forcing two prisoners to commit oral sexual acts and for forcing one prisoner to sexually mutilate another prisoner as it was not established that the victims were protected persons. Thus, for the same acts as he was found guilty by the Trial Chamber.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-94-1
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Dusko Sikirica (Sikirica et al. "Keraterm Camp")
- Year
- 2001
- Issues
- Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Camp Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Aiding and Abetting Instigating Command Responsibility
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/775/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Dusko Sikirica
- Charges
- - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(3) (command responsibility) for sexual assault of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained at the Keraterm camp.- Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as war crimes under Articles 7(1) (instigating, committing or aiding and abetting) and 7(3) (command responsibility) for sexual assault of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained at the Keraterm camp.- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and complicity in genocide under Articles 7(1) and 7(3) for subjecting Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat detainees at Keraterm camp to rapes and sexual assault.
- Trial chamber verdict
- Sikirica entered a guilty plea on 19 September 2001 and was found guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity As Sikirica entered a guilty plea to persecution as a crime against humanity only, the other sexual violence charges were withdrawn. Sikirica was therefore found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as war crimes - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and complicity in genocide
- sentencing
- Sikirica was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment by the Trial Chamber on 13 November 2001.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-95-8
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Dragan Nikolic (“Susica Camp”)
- Year
- 2005
- Issues
- Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Camp Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Detention Centers Terrorism Aiding and Abetting
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/754/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Dragan Nikolic
- Charges
- Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (committing) for the persecution of Muslim and non-Serb detainees at the Sušica camp by participating in sexual violence directed at women at the Sušica camp and by subjecting detainees to an atmosphere of terror, which included sexual violence.- Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (aiding and abetting) for facilitating the removal of female detainees from the hangar, which he knew was for purposes of rapes committed by camp guards, special forces, local soldiers and other men and by encouraging these rapes.
- Trial chamber verdict
- Nikolic entered a guilty plea to all charges in the indictment on 4 September 2003. Nikolic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity - Rape as a crime against humanity
- sentencing
- Nikolic was sentenced by the Trial Chamber to 20 years’ imprisonment on 4 February 2005.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-94-2
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Biljana Plavsic (“Bosnia and Herzegovina”)
- Year
- 2003
- Issues
- Female Perpetrators of Sexual Violence
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Sexual Violence as Genocide
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/758/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Biljana Plavsic
- Charges
- - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs through various acts, including rapes and sexual violence. - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction as genocide and complicity in genocide under Articles 7(1) (JCE) and 7(3) for subjecting Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat detainees at various detention facilities to sexual violence.
- Trial chamber verdict
- Plavsic entered a guilty plea on 2 October 2002 and was found guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity . As Plavsic entered a guilty plea to persecution as a crime against humanity only, the other sexual violence charges were withdrawn. Plavsic was therefore found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction as genocide and complicity in genocide.
- sentencing
- Plavsic received a sentence of 11 years’ imprisonment on 27 February 2003.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-00-39 & 40/1
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Anto Furundžija (“Lašva Valley”)
- Year
- 2000
- Issues
- Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Akayesu Penetration Coercion Forced Nudity Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Aiding and Abetting Co-perpetration
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/684/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Anto Furundžija
- Charges
- - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (co-perpetration) - Outrages upon personal dignity (including rape) as a violation of the laws or customs of war under Article 7(1) (aiding and abetting) for interrogating Witness A, who was naked, while Accused B rubbed his knife on Witness A’s inner thighs and threatened to cut out her private parts if she did not tell the truth in answer to the interrogation by Furundžija. Accused B then repeatedly raped Witness A in front of an audience of soldiers.
- Trial chamber verdict
- Furundžija was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 10 December 1998 of: - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Outrages upon personal dignity (including rape) as a violation of the laws or customs of war. Although Furundžija did not rape Witness A himself, the Trial Chamber found that his presence and continued interrogation of Witness A aided and abetted the crimes committed by Accused B.
- Appeals chamber verdict
- The Appeals Chamber on 21 July 2000 affirmed the convictions made by the Trial Chamber.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-95-17/1
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICC - Iraq/UK
- Issues
- Sexual Violence against Men
- Country
- Iraq, United Kingdom
- Keywords
- Forced Masturbation Genitalia Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Preliminary Investigation
- Reference link
- https://www.icc-cpi.int/iraq
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Court
- Status
- 2778
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ECHR - Aydin v. Turkey
- Year
- 1997
- Issues
- Sentencing and Reparations Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
- Country
- Turkey
- Keywords
- Forced Nudity Medical Forensic Exam/Rape Kit Vulnerability Psychological Impact Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Right to an Effective Remedy
- Reference link
- http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-6215#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-6215%22]}
- Type of mechanism
- Regional court
- Name of mechanism
- European Court of Human Rights
- Name of accused
- Aydin v. Turkey
- sentencing
- In view of the extremely serious violation of the Convention and the consequent enduring psychological harm suffered by the applicant on account of the rape the Court awarded the applicant £25,000.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- 23178/94
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ECCC - Kaing Guek Eav (“Duch”)
- Year
- 2012
- Issues
- Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
- Country
- Cambodia
- Keywords
- Penetration Reparation Vagina Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Rape with Foreign Objects Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Kunarac
- Reference link
- https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/case/topic/90
- Type of mechanism
- Hybrid court
- Name of mechanism
- Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
- Name of accused
- Kaing Guek Eav
- Charges
- Kaing was indicted on 8 August 2008 and the indictment was confirmed and partially amended on 5 December 2008 for crimes against humanity, including torture (which incorporated one instance of rape) and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions (Articles 5, 6 and 29 (new) (JCE through ‘committing’) of the ECCC Law) committed in Phnom Penh and within the territory of Cambodia between 17 April 1975 and 6 January 1979. Kaing held a central leadership role at the Security Center S-21, which he abused by training, ordering, and supervising staff in the systematic torture and execution of prisoners deemed to be enemies of the Democratic Kampuchea regime.
- Trial chamber verdict
- On 26 July 2010, the Trial Chamber convicted Kaing for crimes against humanity, including torture (which included one instance of rape) and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions under the JCE. The rape as torture conviction related to the incident where an S-21 staff member inserted a stick into the vagina of a detainee during an interrogation.
- sentencing
- Kaing was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment by the Trial Chamber. However, the Supreme Court quashed this decision and instead sentenced him to life imprisonment.
- Appeals chamber verdict
- On 6 July 6 2010, the Supreme Court confirmed and partly amended the conviction (the conviction for rape as torture as a crime against humanity remained standing). The Supreme Court stated the Trial Chamber had erred in law by attaching insufficient weight to the gravity of Kaing’s crimes as well as the aggravating circumstances in this case, and that that too much weight had been attached to the mitigating circumstances. Note that the Co-Prosecutors had requested that the Supreme Court Chamber cumulatively convict Kaing for both rape and torture as crimes against humanity. However, given the lack of support for the existence of rape as a distinct crime against humanity during the ECCC’s temporal jurisdiction, the Supreme Court Chamber found that the Trial Chamber erred in concluding that the incident that occurred at S-21 constituted rape as a crime against humanity. Accordingly, this part of the Co-Prosecutors’ appeal failed automatically. Rape was still charged and convicted as torture as a crime against humanity.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- Case 001
- Reparations / awards
- The Trial Chamber admitted 64 applicants as Civil Parties and awarded them reparations, which included inclusion of the names and their deceased family members in the judgment and the compilation and publication of all statements of apology and acknowledgement of responsibility made by Duch on the ECCC website.
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Radovan Stankovic
- Year
- 2007
- Issues
- Sexual Violence against Children Sentencing and Reparations
- Country
- Bosnia Herzegovina
- Keywords
- Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Torture Forced to watch Rape Incitement
- Reference link
- http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/3259
- Type of mechanism
- Domestic court
- Name of mechanism
- Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
- Name of accused
- Radovan Stankovic
- Charges
- Stankovic was charged (on 3 March 2003 as amended on 8 December 2003) with crimes against humanity, including rape (Articles 172(1)(c), (e), (f) and (g) of the Criminal Code of BiH) for having set up a detention centre for (often under aged) women, having incited other soldiers to rape detainees, and having coerced several detainees into forced labor and sexual intercourse.
- Trial chamber verdict
- On 14 November 2006, the Court of BiH found Stankovic guilty for crimes against humanity, including enslavement, imprisonment, torture and rape for: (i) Establishing a detention centre (“Karaman’s House”), detaining at least nine female persons and inciting soldiers to rape them; (ii) Compelling detainees to forced labor, inside and outside of the detention center; (iii) Repeatedly raping a detainee, compelling her to forced labor at several locations and having her witness him raping her under aged sister; (iv) Raping a detainee at another detention centre. Stankovic was sentenced to sixteen years’ imprisonment.
- sentencing
- The Appellate Panel increased the sentence from 16 to 20 years' imprisonment. Shortly afterwards, Stankovic escaped from jail. He was recaptured in January 2012. he was then sentenced to another two Year' imprisonment for using force while escaping.
- Appeals chamber verdict
- The prosecution appealed against the sentence of 16 years’ imprisonment and the acquittal of one of the charges (forcibly taking a female patient from a hospital in Foca and raping her). Stankovic himself basically contested all the Court’s findings, most notably stating that the witness statements were false and fabricated. On 28 March 2007, the Appellate Panel left intact the entire verdict, though it raised the sentence to 20 years’ imprisonment.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- X-KRZ-05/70
This is free software. Created with LinkAhead
and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).