Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database
A collection of relevant literature and case law
Showing 1 to 10 of 11 results.
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ECCC - Ieng Sary (“Nuon Chea et al.”)
- Year
- 2013
- Issues
- Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
- Country
- Cambodia
- Keywords
- Aiding and Abetting Coercion Common Purpose Consent Forced Marriage Death of Accused Ordering/Instigating Severance of Charges
- Reference link
- https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/indicted-personpage/ieng-sary
- Type of mechanism
- Hybrid court
- Name of mechanism
- Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
- Name of accused
- Ieng Sary
- Charges
- Ieng Sary was charged, in the closing order (indictment) of 15 September 2010, with: - Rape as a crime against humanity, which included forced marriage. - Other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, which included forced marriage. Both for committing (via a joint criminal enterprise), planning, instigating, ordering, or aiding and abetting, or by virtue of superior responsibility punishable under Article 29(new) of the ECCC Law.
- Trial chamber verdict
- However, the accused appealed the closing order stating that during the relevant time (1975-1979), rape was not yet applicable as an enumerated crime under crimes against humanity. The Pre-Trial Chamber agreed that during that time period rape was not a crime in its own, but ruled that the facts described as rape can be subsumed as ‘other inhumane acts’. Accordingly, on 13 January 2011, the Pre-Trial Chamber struck rape as a crime against humanity from the indictment. On 22 September 2011 the Trial Chamber severed Case 002 in two trials. The first trial of Case 002 was limited to forced transfers of the population. The second trial of Case 002 includes forced marriage and rape (nationwide) as crimes against humanity. Trial hearings in Case 002/02 commenced on 17 October 2014 and the presentation of evidence started on 8 January 2015. The proceedings against Ieng Sary were, however, terminated on 14 March 2013, following his death the same day.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- Case 002
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ECCC - Ieng Thirith (“Nuon Chea et al.”)
- Year
- 2015
- Issues
- Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Female Perpetrators of Sexual Violence Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
- Country
- Cambodia
- Keywords
- Aiding and Abetting Coercion Common Purpose Consent Death of Accused Ordering/Instigating Severance of Charges
- Reference link
- https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/indicted-personpage/ieng-thirith
- Type of mechanism
- Hybrid court
- Name of mechanism
- Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
- Name of accused
- Ieng Thirith
- Charges
- Ieng Thirith was charged, in the closing order (indictment) of 15 September 2010, with: - Rape as a crime against humanity, which included forced marriage. - Other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, which included forced marriage. Both for committing (via a joint criminal enterprise), planning, instigating, ordering, or aiding and abetting, or by virtue of superior responsibility punishable under Article 29 (new) of the ECCC Law.
- Trial chamber verdict
- However, the accused appealed the closing order stating that during the relevant time (1975-1979), rape was not yet applicable as an enumerated crime under crimes against humanity. The Pre-Trial Chamber agreed that during that time period rape was not a crime in its own, but ruled that the facts described as rape can be subsumed as ‘other inhumane acts’. Accordingly, on 13 January 2011, the Pre-Trial Chamber struck rape as a crime against humanity from the indictment. On 22 September 2011 the Trial Chamber severed Case 002 in two trials. The first trial of Case 002 was limited to forced transfers of the population. The second trial of Case 002 includes forced marriage and rape (nationwide) as crimes against humanity. Trial hearings in Case 002/02 commenced on 17 October 2014 and the presentation of evidence started on 8 January 2015. However, Ieng Thirith was found unfit to stand trial, and the Trial Chamber stayed the proceedings against her. She was released from provisional detention on 16 September 2012. The Supreme Court Chamber subsequently imposed a regime of judicial supervision. Ieng Thirith died on 22 August 2015.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- Case 002
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICC - Charles Ble Goude (“Laurent Gbagbo and Charles Ble Goude”)
- Issues
- Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
- Country
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Keywords
- Aiding and Abetting Ordering/Instigating Post-election Violence Rape as Crime Against Humanity
- Reference link
- https://www.icc-cpi.int/EN_Menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/icc0211/related%20cases/icc-02_11-01_15/Pages/default.aspx
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Court
- Name of accused
- Charles Ble Goude
- Charges
- Ble Goude is accused, in the warrant of arrest (unsealed on 30 September 2013) of four counts of crimes against humanity, including: - Rape as a crime against humanity, allegedly committed in the context of post-electoral violence in Côte d'Ivoire between 16 December 2010 and 12 April 2011, as an indirect co-perpetrator pursuant to Article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute. In the Decision on the Confirmation of Charges of 11 December 2014, the following was confirmed: - Rape as a crime against humanity for the rape of at least 38 persons, committed by pro-Gbagbo forces. Ble Goude is responsible alternatively, as detailed below, under article 25(3)(a) (indirect co-perpetration), 25(3)(b) (ordering, soliciting or inducing), 25(3)(c) (aiding, abetting or otherwise assisting) or 25(3)(d) of the Statute: - under article 25(3)(a), (b), (c) or (d) of the Statute for the crime against humanity of the rape of at least 22 women committed on or around 12 April 2011 in Yopougon commune, Abidjan; - under article 25(3)(b), (c) or (d) of the Statute for the crime against humanity of the rape of at least 16 women and girls committed between 16 and 19 December 2010 during and after the pro-Ouattara march heading to the RTI headquarters.
- Trial chamber verdict
- On 11 March 2015, Trial Chamber I joined his case and the one of Laurent Gbagbo in order to ensure the efficacy and expeditiousness of the proceedings. On 23 July 2018, Defence Counsel filed a “No case to answer motion” (“the Motion”) on grounds that the Prosecution had not adduced sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction. Following this motion, the Trial Chamber I of the ICC by majority, on 15 January 2019, acquitted Mr Laurent Gbagbo and Mr Charles Blé Goudé from all charges of crimes against humanity allegedly committed in Côte d'Ivoire in 2010 and 2011. The Chamber concluded after assessing the evidence that the Prosecutor had not furnished the court with sufficient evidence to establish the requisite elements for establishing the liability of Mr Gbagbo and Mr. Blé for the crimes charged.
- Appeals chamber verdict
- Following an appeal by the Prosecutor, the Appeals chamber amended the conditions of release, although it stuck to the previous decision to acquit the accused from all charges. On 1 February 2019, the Appeals Chamber pronounced the conditions for the release of Mr Gbagbo and Mr Blé Goudé to a State that is willing to accept them on its territory and willing and able to enforce the conditions set by the Chamber and amended them on 21 February 2019.
- Status
- 2778
- Case number
- ICC-02/11-01/15
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTR - Arsène Shalom Ntahobali (Nyiramasuhuko et al. "Butare")
- Year
- 2015
- Issues
- Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions Sentencing and Reparations
- Country
- Rwanda
- Keywords
- Forced Nudity Undue Delay Fair Trial Aiding and Abetting Ordering/Instigating Direct Commission Rape as Crime Against Humanity
- Reference link
- http://www.unictr.org/en/cases/ictr-98-42
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
- Name of accused
- Arsène Shalom Ntahobali
- Charges
- - Rape as a crime against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for: (i) raping a Tutsi girl at the roadblock near his hotel (committing); (ii) raping Tutsi women (committing), ordering Interahamwe to rape Tutsi women (ordering), and aiding and abetting the rapes of Tutsi women at the Butare prefecture office (aiding and abetting). - Sexual violence as genocide, persecution as a crime against humanity and violence to life, health and physical or mental well-being as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime, and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Articles 6(1) (direct responsibility) and 6(3) (command responsibility) due to insufficient notice of the Prosecutor’s intention to pursue these sexual violence crimes. - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Articles 6(1) (direct responsibility) and 6(3) (command responsibility) due to insufficient notice of the Prosecutor’s intention to pursue these sexual violence crimes and that it adduced insufficient evidence to prove that Ntahobali forced his victims to undress completely before forcing them into vehicles and taking them to their deaths.
- Trial chamber verdict
- Ntahobali was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 24 June 2011 of: - Rape as a crime against humanity and - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime Ntahobali was found not guilty of: - Sexual violence as genocide; - Persecution as a crime against humanity; - Violence to life, health and physical or mental well-being as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime; - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity due to insufficient notice of the Prosecutor’s intention to pursue these sexual violence crimes. - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity due to insufficient notice of the Prosecutor’s intention to pursue these sexual violence crimes and that it adduced insufficient evidence to prove that Ntahobali forced his victims to undress completely before forcing them into vehicles and taking them to their deaths.
- sentencing
- Ntahobali’s sentence was reduced to 47 years’ imprisonment, in particular due to a violation of the accused’s right to be tried without undue delay.
- Appeals chamber verdict
- On 14 December 2015, the Appeals Chamber upheld most of the findings in respect of the sexual violence conviction ((i) killing a Tutsi girl he had first raped at the Hotel Ihuliro roadblock in late April 1994; (ii) raping a Tutsi girl near the Hotel Ihuliro roadblock in late April 1994 as well as Witness TA during two attacks in May 1994 at the prefectural office; (iii) ordering the rape of Witness TA at the prefectural office during an attack in the last of half of May 1994; and (iv) aiding and abetting the rapes of Witness TA at the prefectural office in June 1994), except - having found errors in the Trial Chamber’s reasoning – for (i) raping Tutsi women, other than Witness TA, at the Butare Prefecture Office; and (ii) ordering the rapes of six Tutsi women, other than Witness TA, at the Butare Prefecture Office during an attack in the last half of May 1994. Ntahobali’s sentence was reduced to 47 years’ imprisonment, in particular due to a violation of the accused’s right to be tried without undue delay.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- ICTR-98-42
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTR - Jean-Paul Akayesu
- Year
- 2001
- Issues
- Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
- Country
- Rwanda
- Keywords
- Forced Nudity Aiding and Abetting Ordering/Instigating Sexual Violence as Genocide Rape as Crime Against Humanity Akayesu
- Reference link
- http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-96-4
- Full reference
- International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu, Judgment, 1 June 2001, ICTR-96-4.
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
- Name of accused
- Jean-Paul Akayesu
- Charges
- - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for: i) the rape of Witness JJ by an Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (ii) multiple acts of rape of fifteen girls and women by numerous Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (iii) multiple acts of rape of ten girls and women by numerous Interahamwe (ordering, instigating and aiding and abetting); (iv) the rape of Witness OO by an Interahamwe named Antoine (ordering, instigating and aiding and abetting); (v) the rape of a woman by Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (vi) the rape of the younger sister of Witness NN by an Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (vii) the multiple rapes of Alexia, wife of Ntereye, and her two nieces Louise and Nishimwe by Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for: (i) the forced undressing of the wife of Tharcisse (aiding and abetting); (ii) the forced undressing and naked public marching of Chantal (ordering, instigating and aiding and abetting); and (iii) the forced undressing of Alexia, wife of Ntereye, and her two nieces Louise and Nishimwe and to have them perform exercises naked in public (aiding and abetting). - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for all of the above mentioned sexual violence acts (aiding and abetting). - Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular rape, degrading and humiliating treatment and indecent assault, as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime
- Trial chamber verdict
- Akayesu was found guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 2 September 1998) for a number of sexual violence crimes that took place in and around the Taba bureau communal: - Rape as a crime against humanity - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide Akayesu was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular rape, degrading and humiliating treatment and indecent assault, as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime as the Trial Chamber found that it was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the acts perpetrated by Akayesu were committed in conjunction with the armed conflict.
- sentencing
- Akayesu received a single sentence of life imprisonment (for genocide he had received a sentence of life imprisonment; for rape as a crime against humanity 15 years’ imprisonment; and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity 10 years’ imprisonment).
- Appeals chamber verdict
- The sexual violence convictions by the Trial Chamber were upheld by the Appeals Chamber (on 1 June 2001).
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- ICTR-96-4
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTR transfer - Ladislas Ntaganzwa
- Issues
- Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
- Country
- Rwanda
- Keywords
- Amended Indictment Aiding and Abetting Interahamwe Ordering/Instigating Hostage
- Reference link
- http://www.unmict.org/en/cases/mict-12-21
- Type of mechanism
- Domestic court
- Name of accused
- Ladislas Ntaganzwa
- Charges
- Ntaganzwa is charged with sexual violence crimes (in the second amended indictment of 30 March 2012) as follows: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (committing, ordering and instigating, and aiding and abetting) and 6(3) (command responsibility). - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (committing, ordering and instigating, and aiding and abetting) and 6(3) (command responsibility). The underlying facts that relate to the sexual violence for all these charges concern: (i) at a date in early May 1994, at the Ryabidandi roadblock, Ryabidandi cellule, Nyagisozi secteur, Nyakizu commune, Ntaganzwa instructed and prompted a group of about eight JDR, interahamwe, and Hutu and Twa civilians to rape a Tutsi woman named Astorie (last name unknown). Acting on the direct instructions and the prompting of Ntaganzwa, Astorie was repeatedly raped during the night at a residence close to the Judicial Police Inspector’s residence within Ryabidandi cellule; (ii) On or about the day after this event, Ntaganzwa instructed and prompted a certain Habib, a Hutu civilian, to rape ARH, a Tutsi woman. Following Ntaganzwa’s instructions and prompting, Habib took ARH hostage and repeatedly raped her for a period of approximately 2 months.
- Status
- 2778
- Case number
- MICT-12-21
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTR transfer - Ryandikayo
- Issues
- Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
- Country
- Rwanda
- Keywords
- Accused at large Aiding and Abetting Ordering/Instigating Interahamwe
- Reference link
- http://unictr.irmct.org/en/cases/ictr-95-1e
- Type of mechanism
- Domestic court
- Name of accused
- Ryandikayo
- Charges
- Ryandikayo is charged with sexual violence crimes (in the second amended indictment of 8 May 2012) as follows: - Genocide for harming, including by raping, under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). [NB. Only 2(3)(a) is charged, not 2(3)(b), even though rape is mentioned for the count of genocide] - Complicity in genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). The underlying facts that relate to the sexual violence for all these charges concern: (i) Ryandikayo took Jacqueline Uwineza into his house in Mubuga where he raped her and then took her to his banana plantation where she was killed by Interahamwe who beat her with clubs and machetes on his instigation and prompting (paragraph 24); (ii) the leading of six Tutsi girls on foot to the Mubuga cemetery and raping them, on the instructions of, inter alia, Ryandikayo (paragraph 33); (iii) in the course of an attack at Mubuga Catholic church, Ryandikayo together with Interahamwe and armed Hutu civilians, who acted in accordance with Ryandikayo’s instructions, prompting, and plan, raped and killed other Tutsi girls who were in the parish. Among them was a girl by the name of Claudine who resided near the parish.
- Status
- 2778
- Case number
- MICT-12-22
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Goran Hadzic
- Issues
- Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Aiding and Abetting Detention Centers Ill-health Ordering/Instigating Psychological Impact
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/694/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Goran Hadzic
- Charges
- Hadzic is charged with sexual violence crimes in the indictment (of 22 July 2001) and includes persecution as a crime against humanity, torture as a crime against humanity, inhumane acts as crimes against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Articles 7(1) (committing in concert with others, planning, instigating, ordering, and/or aiding and abetting) and 7(3) (command responsibility) for imposing on Croat and other non-Serb civilian detainees living conditions in various detention facilities in the SAO SBWS characterized by, inter alia, inhumane treatment and constant physical and psychological assault, including sexual assault.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-04-75
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Idriz Balaj ("Haradinaj et al.")
- Year
- 2012
- Issues
- Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions Sexual Violence against Men
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Ordering/Instigating Kunarac Unreliable Testimony Retrial
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Idriz Balaj
- Charges
- Balaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing or planning), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02 and Witness 61.
- Trial chamber verdict
- Although Balaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was acquitted on all charges against him by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, which thus includes the sexual violence charges stipulated above.
- Appeals chamber verdict
- The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to acquit Balaj on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Balaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. Balaj was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 after retrial.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-04-84
-
Jurisprudence judicial mechanism
ICTY - Lahi Brahimaj ("Haradinaj et al.")
- Year
- 2012
- Issues
- Sexual Violence against Men Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
- Country
- Former Yugoslavia
- Keywords
- Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Kunarac Ordering/Instigating Retrial Unreliable Testimony
- Reference link
- http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
- Type of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal/Court
- Name of mechanism
- International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
- Name of accused
- Lahi Brahimaj
- Charges
- Brahimaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02 and Witness 61.
- Trial chamber verdict
- Although Brahimaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was found, by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, not guilty of the charges of sexual violence against him.
- sentencing
- Brahimaj was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment (for other charges).
- Appeals chamber verdict
- The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to hold Brahimaj not guilty on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Brahimaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. He was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 for the charges in the re-trial indictment and thus for the remaining sexual violence charge.
- Status
- 2715
- Case number
- IT-04-84
This is free software. Created with LinkAhead
and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).