Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 21 to 30 of 33 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    SCSL - Issa Hassan Sesay (Sesay et al. "RUF")

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Sierra Leone
    Keywords
    Forced Marriage Consent Terrorism AFRC Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) RUF

    Reference link
    http://www.rscsl.org/RUF.html
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)
    Name of accused
    Issa Hassan Sesay
    Charges
    - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the rapes committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District.- Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the crimes of sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District.- Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for the crimes of rapes, sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District.- Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for sexual violence crimes committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Sesay was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 March 2009 of: - Rape as a crime against humanity - Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime - Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime
    sentencing
    Sesay was sentenced to 52 years’ imprisonment on 26 October 2009.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions concerning sexual violence were upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 26 October 2009.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    SCSL-04-15

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    SCSL - Morris Kallon (Sesay et al. "RUF")

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Sierra Leone
    Keywords
    Forced Marriage Consent AFRC RUF Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Lack of Consent

    Reference link
    http://www.rscsl.org/RUF.html
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)
    Name of accused
    Morris Kallon
    Charges
    - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the rapes committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District.- Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the crimes of sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District, and under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the crimes of sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Kissi Town in Kono District.- Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for the crimes of rapes, sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District, and under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the crimes of sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Kissi Town in Kono District.- Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for sexual violence crimes committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District, and under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the crimes of sexual slavery committed in Kissi Town in Kono District.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kallon was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 March 2009 of: - Rape as a crime against humanity - Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime - Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes
    sentencing
    Kallon was sentenced to 40 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions concerning sexual violence were upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 26 October 2009.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    SCSL-04-15

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ECCC - Kaing Guek Eav (“Duch”)

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Cambodia
    Keywords
    Penetration Reparation Vagina Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Rape with Foreign Objects Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Kunarac

    Reference link
    https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/case/topic/90
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
    Name of accused
    Kaing Guek Eav
    Charges
    Kaing was indicted on 8 August 2008 and the indictment was confirmed and partially amended on 5 December 2008 for crimes against humanity, including torture (which incorporated one instance of rape) and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions (Articles 5, 6 and 29 (new) (JCE through ‘committing’) of the ECCC Law) committed in Phnom Penh and within the territory of Cambodia between 17 April 1975 and 6 January 1979. Kaing held a central leadership role at the Security Center S-21, which he abused by training, ordering, and supervising staff in the systematic torture and execution of prisoners deemed to be enemies of the Democratic Kampuchea regime.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 26 July 2010, the Trial Chamber convicted Kaing for crimes against humanity, including torture (which included one instance of rape) and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions under the JCE. The rape as torture conviction related to the incident where an S-21 staff member inserted a stick into the vagina of a detainee during an interrogation.
    sentencing
    Kaing was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment by the Trial Chamber. However, the Supreme Court quashed this decision and instead sentenced him to life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 6 July 6 2010, the Supreme Court confirmed and partly amended the conviction (the conviction for rape as torture as a crime against humanity remained standing). The Supreme Court stated the Trial Chamber had erred in law by attaching insufficient weight to the gravity of Kaing’s crimes as well as the aggravating circumstances in this case, and that that too much weight had been attached to the mitigating circumstances. Note that the Co-Prosecutors had requested that the Supreme Court Chamber cumulatively convict Kaing for both rape and torture as crimes against humanity. However, given the lack of support for the existence of rape as a distinct crime against humanity during the ECCC’s temporal jurisdiction, the Supreme Court Chamber found that the Trial Chamber erred in concluding that the incident that occurred at S-21 constituted rape as a crime against humanity. Accordingly, this part of the Co-Prosecutors’ appeal failed automatically. Rape was still charged and convicted as torture as a crime against humanity.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    Case 001
    Reparations / awards
    The Trial Chamber admitted 64 applicants as Civil Parties and awarded them reparations, which included inclusion of the names and their deceased family members in the judgment and the compilation and publication of all statements of apology and acknowledgement of responsibility made by Duch on the ECCC website.

  • Literature

    Jarvis, Michelle and Martin Salgado, Elena - Future Challenges to Prosecuting Sexual Violence...

    Year
    2013
    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Rape Responsibility Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Camp Prosecution

    Reference link
    https://intersentia.com/en/sexual-violence-as-an-international-crime-interdisciplinary-approaches.html
    Full reference
    Jarvis, Michelle and Elena Martin Salgado, "Future Challenges to Prosecuting Sexual Violence under International Law: Insights from ICTY Practice", in Anne-Marie de Brouwer et al. (eds.), Sexual Violence as an International Crime: Interdisciplinary Approaches, Intersentia, Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland, 2013, pp. 101-122.
    Type of literature
    Journal Article
    Research focus
    Gaps in the Jurisprudence and Legislation on Conflict-related Sexual Violence crimes
    Author
    Jarvis, Michelle and Martin Salgado, Elena
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Edouard Karemera (“Karemera et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Genocidal Rape Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Sexual Violence as Genocide Superior Responsibility

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-98-44
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Edouard Karemera
    Charges
    - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide. -Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rapes and sexual violence committed against Tutsi women and girls committed by Interahamwe. (As for genocide and JCE III, the sexual violence committed after 11 April 1994; as for genocide and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe. As for crimes against humanity and JCE III, the sexual violence committed in Ruhengeri prefecture, Kigali-ville prefecture, Butare prefecture, Kibuye prefecture and Gitarama prefecture; as for crimes against humanity and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Karemera was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 February 2012 of:- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide-Rape as a crime against humanity
    sentencing
    Karemera received a sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 29 September 2014 reversed the Trial Chamber’s finding that Karemera bore superior responsibility over the Kigali and/or Gisenyi Interahamwe in relation to the rapes and sexual assaults of Tutsi women committed outside Kigali from April to June 1994. The other sexual violence convictions by the Trial Chamber remained standing.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-44

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Matthieu Ngirumpatse (“Karemera et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Superior Responsibility Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Sexual Violence as Genocide

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-98-44
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Matthieu Ngirumpatse
    Charges
    - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide. -Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rapes and sexual violence committed against Tutsi women and girls committed by Interahamwe. (As for genocide and JCE III, the sexual violence committed after 11 April 1994; as for genocide and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe. As for crimes against humanity and JCE III, the sexual violence committed in Ruhengeri prefecture,Kigali-ville prefecture, Butare prefecture, Kibuye prefecture and Gitarama prefecture; as for crimes against humanity and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ngirumpatse was found guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 2 February 2012) of: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rapes and sexual violence committed against Tutsi women and girls committed by Interahamwe. As for genocide and JCE III, the sexual violence committed after 11 April 1994; as for genocide and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe. As for crimes against humanity and JCE III, the sexual violence committed in Ruhengeri prefecture, Kigali-ville prefecture, Butare prefecture, Kibuye prefecture and Gitarama prefecture; as for crimes against humanity and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe.
    sentencing
    Ngirumpatse received a sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 29 September 2014 reversed the Trial Chamber’s finding that Ngirumpatse bore superior responsibility over the Kigali and/or Gisenyi Interahamwe in relation to the rapes and sexual assaults of Tutsi women committed outside Kigali from April to June 1994. The other sexual violence convictions by the Trial Chamber remain standing.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-44

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Nebojsa Pavkovic (“Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Persecution on Sexual Grounds Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Superior Responsibility Physical Integrity Consent Foreseeable Consequence Common Objective of JCE Kosovo Albanian Civilians Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Nebojsa Pavkovic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE III) for sexual assaults committed in Decani/Deçan and in Cirez/Qirez in the municipality of Srbica/Skenderaj by the VJ and MUP forces executing his orders. - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Pavkovic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity Pavkovic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity
    sentencing
    Pavkovic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 22 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber, with Judge Liu and Judge Tuzmukhamedov dissenting, subsequently found that the Trial Chamber incorrectly held Pavkovic not guilty for committing through his participation in a JCE III persecution, through sexual assaults, as a crime against humanity in Priština/Prishtina, but declined, Judge Ramaroson dissenting, to enter new convictions against him in this regard (with reference to Article 25(2) of the ICTY Statute and the Jelisic Appeal Judgement, para. 73 (discretion in choice of remedy lies with the Chamber)).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Vlastimir Dordevic (“Kosovo”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Sexual Assault/Attack/Abuse Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Kosovo Albanian Civilians Partner Violence

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/810/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Vlastimir Dordevic
    Charges
    - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through various crimes, including the sexual assaults of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians. - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) for the sexual assaults of Witness K20, the other two women in Beleg, Witness K14, and the girl in a convoy.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Dordevic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber on 23 February 2011 of: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity - Persecution as a crime against humanity
    sentencing
    Dordevic was sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment on 27 January 2014.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber reversed on 27 January 2014 the Trial Chamber’s acquittal for persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (under JCE III) for the sexual assaults of Witness K20, the other two women in Beleg, Witness K14, and the girl in a convoy, with Judge Güney and Judge Tuzmukhamedov dissenting in part.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Mico Stanisic (“Stanisic & Zupljanin”)

    Year
    2016
    Issues
    Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Torture Camp Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Bosnian Muslim Population Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/783/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Mico Stanisic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) of Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat populations, which included sexual violence committed in detention facilities.- Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for subjecting Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats in camps, police stations, military barracks and other detention facilities to various crimes, including sexual violence.- Torture as a crime against humanity, cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) for subjecting Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats in camps, police stations, military barracks and other detention facilities to various crimes, including sexual violence (similar as above under ‘torture’).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Stanisic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 27 March 2013 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity. - Torture and murder as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime Stanisic was found not guilty of (in light of the cumulative convictions principles): - Torture as a crime against humanity, cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as a crime against humanity.
    sentencing
    Stanisic was sentenced by the Trial Chamber to 22 years’ imprisonment on 30 June 2016.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber confirmed the Trial Chamber's judgment on 30 June 2016.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-08-91

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Stojan Župljanin (“Stanišic & Župljanin”)

    Year
    2016
    Issues
    Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Camp Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Bosnian Muslim Population Acquittal Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/783/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Stojan Župljanin
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) of Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat populations, which included sexual violence committed in detention facilities.- Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for subjecting Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats in camps, police stations, military barracks and other detention facilities to various crimes, including sexual violence.- Torture as a crime against humanity, cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) for subjecting Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats in camps, police stations, military barracks and other detention facilities to various crimes, including sexual violence (similar as above under ‘torture’).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Župljain was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 27 March 2013 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime Župljain was found not guilty of (in light of the cumulative convictions principles): - Torture as a crime against humanity, cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as a crime against humanity (similar as above under ‘torture’).
    sentencing
    Župljain was sentenced to 22 years’ imprisonment on 30 June 2016.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber confirmed the Trial Chamber's judgment on 30 June 2016.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-08-91

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).