Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 11 to 20 of 33 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ECCC - Kaing Guek Eav (“Duch”)

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Cambodia
    Keywords
    Penetration Reparation Vagina Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Rape with Foreign Objects Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Kunarac

    Reference link
    https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/case/topic/90
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
    Name of accused
    Kaing Guek Eav
    Charges
    Kaing was indicted on 8 August 2008 and the indictment was confirmed and partially amended on 5 December 2008 for crimes against humanity, including torture (which incorporated one instance of rape) and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions (Articles 5, 6 and 29 (new) (JCE through ‘committing’) of the ECCC Law) committed in Phnom Penh and within the territory of Cambodia between 17 April 1975 and 6 January 1979. Kaing held a central leadership role at the Security Center S-21, which he abused by training, ordering, and supervising staff in the systematic torture and execution of prisoners deemed to be enemies of the Democratic Kampuchea regime.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 26 July 2010, the Trial Chamber convicted Kaing for crimes against humanity, including torture (which included one instance of rape) and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions under the JCE. The rape as torture conviction related to the incident where an S-21 staff member inserted a stick into the vagina of a detainee during an interrogation.
    sentencing
    Kaing was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment by the Trial Chamber. However, the Supreme Court quashed this decision and instead sentenced him to life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 6 July 6 2010, the Supreme Court confirmed and partly amended the conviction (the conviction for rape as torture as a crime against humanity remained standing). The Supreme Court stated the Trial Chamber had erred in law by attaching insufficient weight to the gravity of Kaing’s crimes as well as the aggravating circumstances in this case, and that that too much weight had been attached to the mitigating circumstances. Note that the Co-Prosecutors had requested that the Supreme Court Chamber cumulatively convict Kaing for both rape and torture as crimes against humanity. However, given the lack of support for the existence of rape as a distinct crime against humanity during the ECCC’s temporal jurisdiction, the Supreme Court Chamber found that the Trial Chamber erred in concluding that the incident that occurred at S-21 constituted rape as a crime against humanity. Accordingly, this part of the Co-Prosecutors’ appeal failed automatically. Rape was still charged and convicted as torture as a crime against humanity.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    Case 001
    Reparations / awards
    The Trial Chamber admitted 64 applicants as Civil Parties and awarded them reparations, which included inclusion of the names and their deceased family members in the judgment and the compilation and publication of all statements of apology and acknowledgement of responsibility made by Duch on the ECCC website.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Dusko Knezevic (“Mejakic et al.”)

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Rape Sexual Violence Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Persecution on Sexual Grounds Camp

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1063
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Dusko Knezevic
    Charges
    Knezevic was indicted on 14 July 2006 (indictment confirmed) for charges of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (rape and other forms of sexual abuse) (Article 172(g) of the Criminal Code of BiH), under Articles 29 (accomplice) and 180(1) (individual responsibility) of CC BiH. Knezevic participated in abuses and persecutions committed during the period from 30 April to the end of 1992 against the non-Serbs in the territory of the Prijedor municipality; about 7000 non-Serb civilians were subjected to capturing, taking to and arbitrary confinement at the Omarska and Keraterm camps, as part of the plan of permanent removal of the non-Serbs.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 30 May 2008, the Trial Panel found Knezevic guilty of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (rape and other forms of sexual abuse), under Article 180(1), for: “rape and other forms of sexual abuse of the detainees directly or personally committed by persons other than Dusko Knezevic but in furtherance of the described system of ill-treatment and persecution at the camp in which he participated, including witness K019 who was raped on numerous occasions by the camp guards; witness K027 who was sexually assaulted by the shift Commander Mlado Radic and in July 1992 by Nedeljko Grabovac; witness K040 who was sexually abused twice by camp guard Lugar.” These events related to the Omarska camp. In addition, Knezevic was also found guilty of sexual violence committed in Keraterm camp
    sentencing
    Knezevic was sentenced to 31 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 16 February 2009, Knezevic's conviction and sentence was upheld on appeal. However, the mode of liability was changed from Article 180(1) to liability on the grounds of JCE.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRŽ-06/200

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Momcilo Gruban (“Mejakic et al.”)

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Sentencing and Reparations
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Mitigating Circumstances Rape Sexual Abuse Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1063
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Momcilo Gruban
    Charges
    Gruban was indicted on 14 July 2006 (indictment confirmed) for charges of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence. (Article 172(g) of the Criminal Code of BiH), under Articles 29 (accomplice) and 180(1) and (2) (individual and command responsibility) of CC BiH. Gruban participated in abuses and persecutions committed during the period from 30 April to the end of 1992 against the non-Serbs in the territory of the Prijedor municipality; about 7000 non-Serb civilians were subjected to capturing, taking to and arbitrary confinement at the Omarska and Keraterm camps, as part of the plan of permanent removal of the non-Serbs.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 30 May 2008, the Trial Panel found Gruban guilty of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (rape and other forms of sexual abuse), under Article 180(1) and (2), for: “rape and other forms of sexual abuse of detainees directly or personally committed by persons outside of the shift that was under Momcilo Gruban’s command but in furtherance of the described system of ill-treatment and persecution at the camp in which he participated, including witness K027 who was sexually assaulted by the shift Commander Mlado Radic and on another occasion in July 1992 by Nedeljko Grabovac, witness K019, who was raped on numerous occasions by camp guards and witness K040 who was sexually abused twice by camp guard Lugar.” All related to events in the Omarska camp.
    sentencing
    Gruban was sentenced to 11 years’ imprisonment which was reduced to 7 years on appeal.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 16 February 2009, Gruban’s conviction was upheld on appeal. However, the mode of liability was changed from Article 180(1) and (2) to liability on the grounds of JCE. Gruban’s sentence was, however, reduced as the Appellate Panel found that the Trial Panel had not properly taken into consideration the mitigating factors in his case, namely that Gruban had in several instances helped detained people in order to at least alleviate their suffering. Gruban’s sentence was therefore reduced to 7 years’ imprisonment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRZ-06/200

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Zeljko Mejaki (“Mejakic et al.”)

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Rape Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Persecution on Sexual Grounds Sexual Assault/Attack/Abuse

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1063
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Zeljko Mejakic
    Charges
    Mejakic was indicted on 14 July 2006 (indictment confirmed) for charges of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (Article 172(g) of the Criminal Code of BiH), under Articles 29 (accomplice) and 180(1) and (2) (individual and command responsibility) of CC BiH. Mejakic participated in abuses and persecutions committed during the period from 30 April to the end of 1992 against the non-Serbs in the territory of the Prijedor municipality; about 7000 non-Serb civilians were subjected to capturing, taking to and arbitrary confinement at the Omarska and Keraterm camps, as part of the plan of permanent removal of the non-Serbs.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 30 May 2008, the Trial Panel found Mejakic guilty of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence, under Article 180(1) and (2), for: “rapes and other forms of sexual abuse of detainees committed by persons over whom Zeljko Mejakic had effective control and which rapes and sexual abuse were committed in furtherance of the described system of ill-treatment and persecution at the camp in which he participated, including witness K019 who was sexually abused on numerous occasions by the camp guards; witness K027 who was sexually assaulted by the Shift Commander Mlado Radic and on another occasion in July 1992 by Nedeljko Grabovac; witness K040 who was sexually assaulted twice by camp guard Lugar.” All related to events in the Omarska camp.
    sentencing
    Mejakic was sentenced to 21 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 16 February 2009, Mejakic’s conviction and sentence was upheld on appeal. However, the mode of liability was changed from Article 180(1) and (2) to liability on the grounds of JCE.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRZ-06/200

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    SCSL - Augustine Gbao (Sesay et al. "RUF")

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Sierra Leone
    Keywords
    Sexual Slavery Forced Marriage AFRC RUF Lack of Consent Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Rape

    Reference link
    http://www.rscsl.org/RUF.html
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)
    Name of accused
    Augustine Gbao
    Charges
    - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the rapes committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District.- Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the crimes of sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District.- Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for the crimes of rapes, sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District.- Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for sexual violence crimes committed in Kailahun District.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Gbao was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 March 2009 of:- Rape as a crime against humanity - Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes - Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes
    sentencing
    Gbao was sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment on 26 October 2009.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions were upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 26 October 2009.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    SCSL-04-15

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    SCSL - Issa Hassan Sesay (Sesay et al. "RUF")

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Sierra Leone
    Keywords
    Forced Marriage Consent Terrorism AFRC Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) RUF

    Reference link
    http://www.rscsl.org/RUF.html
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)
    Name of accused
    Issa Hassan Sesay
    Charges
    - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the rapes committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District.- Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the crimes of sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District.- Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for the crimes of rapes, sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District.- Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for sexual violence crimes committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Sesay was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 March 2009 of: - Rape as a crime against humanity - Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime - Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime
    sentencing
    Sesay was sentenced to 52 years’ imprisonment on 26 October 2009.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions concerning sexual violence were upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 26 October 2009.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    SCSL-04-15

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    SCSL - Morris Kallon (Sesay et al. "RUF")

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Sierra Leone
    Keywords
    Forced Marriage Consent AFRC RUF Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Lack of Consent

    Reference link
    http://www.rscsl.org/RUF.html
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)
    Name of accused
    Morris Kallon
    Charges
    - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the rapes committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District.- Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the crimes of sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District, and under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the crimes of sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Kissi Town in Kono District.- Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for the crimes of rapes, sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District, and under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the crimes of sexual slavery and forced marriages committed in Kissi Town in Kono District.- Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (JCE) for sexual violence crimes committed in Koidu Town, Bumpeh, Tombodu, Penduma, Bomboafuidu, Sawao and Wendedu in Kono District and in locations in Kailahun District, and under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the crimes of sexual slavery committed in Kissi Town in Kono District.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kallon was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 March 2009 of: - Rape as a crime against humanity - Sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime - Acts of terrorism as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes
    sentencing
    Kallon was sentenced to 40 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions concerning sexual violence were upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 26 October 2009.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    SCSL-04-15

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Milan Martic (“RSK”)

    Year
    2008
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Sexual Violence against Men/Boys Persecution on Sexual Grounds Forced Oral Sex Forced Masturbation Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/733/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Milan Martic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE III) of the Croat, Muslim and other non-Serb civilian population, which included sexual abuses, forced mutual oral sex among detainees or with prison guards and mutual masturbation in the old hospital in Knin.- Torture as a crime against humanity, inhumane acts as crimes against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE III), which included sexual assaults of Croat, Muslim and other non-Serb civilians detained in the old hospital in Knin, forced mutual oral sex among detainees or with prison guards and mutual masturbation.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Martic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 12 June 2007 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity - Torture as a crime against humanity, inhumane acts as crimes against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Martic was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment on 8 October 2008.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions were upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 8 October 2008.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-11

  • Literature

    Haffajee, Rebecca L. - Prosecuting Crimes of Rape and Sexual Violence

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Accountability Akayesu Prosecution Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/65b3/e13e70452bd135177cd33ae7ef45a5fde0e1.pdf
    Full reference
    Haffajee, Rebecca L., "Prosecuting Crimes of Rape and Sexual Violence at the ICTR: The Application of Joint Criminal Enterprise Theory", in Harv. JL & Gender, 2006, vol. 29, no.1, pp. 201-221.
    Type of literature
    Journal Article
    Research focus
    Gaps in the Jurisprudence and Legislation on Conflict-related Sexual Violence crimes
    Author
    Haffajee, Rebecca L.
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Jean Mpambara

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Genocidal Rape Hutu Tutsi Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Aiding and Abetting

    Reference link
    http://www.unictr.org/en/cases/ictr-01-65
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Jean Mpambara
    Charges
    Mpambara was charged with the following sexual violence crimes: Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or, alternatively, complicity in genocide under Article 6(1) (aiding and abetting by omission or, alternatively, JCE III) for acts of sexual violence committed against Tutsi women between 6 and 16 April 1994, including: (i) the rape of a Tutsi woman by two attackers in Gahini sector, in Rukara commune, on or about 8 April 1994; (ii) the rape of a pregnant Hutu woman married to a Tutsi man by multiple attackers in Nyawera sector, in Rukara commune, on or about 11 April 1994; and (iii) the rapes of a number of Tutsi women by soldiers during the attacks on Rukara parish between 7 and 16 April 1994.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Mpambara was found not guilty of all charges by the Trial Chamber on 12 September 2006, thus including sexual violence, and was acquitted.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Prosecution did not appeal the acquittal.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-01-65

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).