Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 1 to 10 of 12 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Sreten Lukic ("Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.")

    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Definition of Sexual Assault Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Knowledge of the Crimes Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Sreten Lukic
    Charges
    Lukic was charged with: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through, inter alia, sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians; and - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1), which included sexual assaults by forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia of the Kosovo Albanian population.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Lukic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 for the charges stipulated above. The Trial Chamber held, with Judge Ali Nawaz Chowhan partly dissenting, that it was not established that the sexual assault charges that were proven (in Beleg and Cirez/Qirez) were reasonably foreseeable to Lukic and that he lacked knowledge of these crimes.
    sentencing
    Lukic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 20 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber, with Judge Liu and Judge Tuzmukhamedov dissenting, subsequently found that the Trial Chamber incorrectly held Lukic not guilty for committing through his participation in a JCE persecution, through sexual assaults, as a crime against humanity in Beleg, Cirez/Qirez, and Pristina/Prishtina, but declined, Judge Ramaroson dissenting, to enter new convictions against him in this regard (with reference to Article 25(2) of the ICTY Statute and the Jelisic Appeal Judgement, para. 73 (discretion in choice of remedy lies with the Chamber)).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragoljub Prcac (Kvocka et al. "Omarska, Keraterm & Trnopolje Camps")

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Forced Nudity Sexual Slavery Forced Prostitution Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Forced to watch Rape Foreseeable Consequence Kunarac Akayesu

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragoljub Prcac
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Prcac was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity Prcac was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Prcac was sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The conviction was upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Miroslav Kvocka (“Kvocka et al.”)

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Cumulative Conviction Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Forced to watch Rape Forced Nudity Foreseeable Consequence Mental Harm Persecution on Sexual Grounds Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Miroslav Kvocka (“Kvocka et al.”)
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp; - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kvocka was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity. Kvocka was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    sentencing
    Kvocka was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 7 years’ imprisonment on 28 February 2005 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Although Kvocka was initially found guilty by the Trial Chamber of persecution as a crime against humanity for the sexual violence crimes, this conviction was reversed by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Zoran Zigic (“Kvocka et al.”)

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Cumulative Conviction Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Forced Nudity Forced to watch Rape Mental Harm Persecution on Sexual Grounds Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Zoran Zigic (“Kvocka et al.”)
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Zigic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE). Zigic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime.
    sentencing
    Zigic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 25 years’ imprisonment on 28 February 2005 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Although Zigic was initially found guilty by the Trial Chamber of persecution as a crime against humanity for the sexual violence crimes, this conviction was reversed by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Oslo District Court - Mirsad Repak

    Year
    2008
    Issues
    Sentencing and Reparations Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Norway
    Keywords
    Acquittal Domestic Law Humiliating and Degrading Treatment Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Complicity Reparation Detention Centers Foreseeable Consequence

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/36
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Oslo District Court
    Name of accused
    Mirsad Repak
    Charges
    Repak was charged with crimes against humanity and war crimes, which both included sexual violence (including of both women and men) under Article 97 of the Norwegian Constitution.
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Court observed that Article 97 of the Norwegian Constitution prohibits any retroactive application of the law unless similar legislation existed at the time of the alleged crimes. The Court ruled that prosecution was possible since the actions described in the indictment were punishable under the Criminal Code in force in 1992 (the time of the crimes). Repak was therefore found guilty of war crimes, including rape (paras. 158-164), but was acquitted for the charges of crimes against humanity, as there was no comparable legislation in 1992.
    sentencing
    Repak was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 11 March 2010, the Norway Court of Appeal reduced Repak’s sentence from 5 to 4,5 years’ imprisonment. On 3 December 2010 the Supreme Court of Norway overturned the conviction against Repak and finally released him. The Supreme Court ruled that the Law on War Crimes of March 2008 could not be applied retroactively to acts committed in 1992. The Court concluded that the retroactive application of the Law on War Crimes would violate Article 97 of the Norwegian Constitution. He was thus acquitted for the charges of war crimes. However, on 14 April 2011, the Supreme Court of Norway found him guilty for unlawful deprivation of liberty and detention of civilians in violation of Section 223(1) and (2) of the 1905 Norwegian Penal Code and sentenced him to eight years in prison. Repak was found guilty on thirteen counts. The indictment charged him with taking part in depriving civilians of liberty and detaining them at the Dretelj detention camp and severe mistreatment of detainees, including sexual abuse, brutal violence, intimidation and humiliation, and deprivation of adequate access to food. The Court concluded that Repak had acted with intent or complicity in the offences, or alternatively could have foreseen the consequences regarding the atrocities suffered by the victims, a level sufficient to find guilt under Section 43 of the Penal Code. According to the sentencing Judge, Repak ‘played a central role in allowing the extensive and sometimes extremely brutal atrocities against the 13 victims to take place’.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    08-018985MED-OTIR/08
    Reparations / awards
    Repak was ordered to pay damages of a total of NKO 400,000 (approximately 51,000 euro) to the families of eight Serbian victims. However, as far as compensation to victims of sexual violence is concerned, the Court ruled that “As regards compensation of economic loss, it is essential for the Court to emphasize that the defendant is only liable for damages where there is a causal relationship between the acts of the defendant and the damage. This means that the defendant is not liable to pay compensation for the extensive damage caused by rapes and gross violence committed by others.”

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragoljub Ojdanic ("Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.")

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Definition of Sexual Assault Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Kunarac Knowledge of the Crimes

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragoljub Ojdanic ("Sainovic et al."; previously Milotinovic et al.)
    Charges
    Ojdanic was charged with: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through, inter alia, sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians; and - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3), which included sexual assaults by forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia of the Kosovo Albanian population.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ojdanic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity; - Persecution as a crime against humanity. With regard to deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity, the Trial Chamber found that, while the forcible displacements were part of the VJ and MUP organized campaign, it was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that sexual assaults were intended aims of this campaign. The Trial Chamber found that it was not proved that Ojdanic was aware that the VJ and MUP were going into some specific crime sites in order to commit sexual assaults and, therefore, the Trial Chamber found that the mental element of aiding and abetting was not established in relation to these crimes. Moreover, it did not find that information regarding the specific sexual assaults, for which it was provided that the VJ was responsible, was available to Ojdanic or that he had reason to know about them.
    sentencing
    Ojdanic was sentenced by the Trial Chamber to 15 years’ imprisonment on 26 February 2009 (for other charges). His sentence was not appealed.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Milan Milutinovic ("Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.")

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Definition of Sexual Assault Kunarac Persecution on Sexual Grounds Foreseeable Consequence Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Milan Milutinovic
    Charges
    Milutinovic was charged with sexual violence crimes: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through, inter alia, sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians; - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3), which included sexual assaults by forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia of the Kosovo Albanian population.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Milutinovic was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 on all charges in the indictment, thus also the sexual violence charges.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87https://www.nurembergacademy.org/typo3/index.php?route=%2Frecord%2Fedit&token=a980ada95207a1920df6d05d7e5322130ee2577e&edit[tx_svdatabase_domain_model_record][441]=edit&returnUrl=%2Ftypo3%2Findex.php%3FM%3Dweb_list%26moduleToken%3Dd464a6b5c4cb9d38

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Nebojsa Pavkovic (“Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Persecution on Sexual Grounds Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Superior Responsibility Physical Integrity Consent Foreseeable Consequence Common Objective of JCE Kosovo Albanian Civilians Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Nebojsa Pavkovic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE III) for sexual assaults committed in Decani/Deçan and in Cirez/Qirez in the municipality of Srbica/Skenderaj by the VJ and MUP forces executing his orders. - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Pavkovic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity Pavkovic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity
    sentencing
    Pavkovic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 22 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber, with Judge Liu and Judge Tuzmukhamedov dissenting, subsequently found that the Trial Chamber incorrectly held Pavkovic not guilty for committing through his participation in a JCE III persecution, through sexual assaults, as a crime against humanity in Priština/Prishtina, but declined, Judge Ramaroson dissenting, to enter new convictions against him in this regard (with reference to Article 25(2) of the ICTY Statute and the Jelisic Appeal Judgement, para. 73 (discretion in choice of remedy lies with the Chamber)).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Nikola Sainovic ("Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.")

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Definition of Sexual Assault Kunarac Knowledge of the Crimes

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Nikola Sainovic
    Charges
    Sainovic was charged with: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through, inter alia, sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians; and - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1), which included sexual assaults by forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia of the Kosovo Albanian population.
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Trial Chamber, with Judge Ali Nawaz Chowhan partly dissenting, held that it was not established that the sexual assault charges that were proven (in Beleg and Cirez/Qirez) were reasonably foreseeable to Sainovic and that he lacked knowledge of these crimes.
    sentencing
    Sainovic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 18 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 23 January 2014, with Judge Liu and Judge Tuzmukhamedov dissenting, subsequently found that the Trial Chamber incorrectly held Sainovic not guilty for committing through his participation in a JCE persecution, through sexual assaults, as a crime against humanity in Beleg, Cirez/Qirez, and Pristina/Prishtina, but declined, Judge Ramaroson dissenting, to enter new convictions against him in this regard (with reference to Article 25(2) of the ICTY Statute and the Jelisic Appeal Judgement, para. 73 (discretion in choice of remedy lies with the Chamber)).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Vladimir Lazarevic ("Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.")

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Definition of Sexual Assault Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Knowledge of the Crimes Kunarac Specific Intent

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Vladimir Lazarevic
    Charges
    Lazarevic was charged with: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through, inter alia, sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians; and - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3), which included sexual assaults by forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia of the Kosovo Albanian population.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Lazarevic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of both the above stipulated charges. With regard to deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity, the Trial Chamber found that, while the forcible displacements were part of the VJ and MUP organized campaign, it was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that sexual assaults were intended aims of this campaign. The Trial Chamber found that it was not proved that Lazarevic was aware that the VJ and MUP were going into some specific crime sites in order to commit sexual assaults and, therefore, the Trial Chamber found that the mental element of aiding and abetting was not established in relation to these crimes. Moreover, it did not find that information regarding the specific sexual assaults, for which it was provided that the VJ was responsible, was available to Lazarevic or that he had reason to know about them.
    sentencing
    Lazarevic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 14 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014 (for other charges).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).