Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 11 to 20 of 25 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragoljub Prcac (Kvocka et al. "Omarska, Keraterm & Trnopolje Camps")

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Forced Nudity Sexual Slavery Forced Prostitution Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Forced to watch Rape Foreseeable Consequence Kunarac Akayesu

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragoljub Prcac
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Prcac was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity Prcac was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Prcac was sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The conviction was upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Idriz Balaj ("Haradinaj et al.")

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions Sexual Violence against Men
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Ordering/Instigating Kunarac Unreliable Testimony Retrial

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Idriz Balaj
    Charges
    Balaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing or planning), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02 and Witness 61.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Balaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was acquitted on all charges against him by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, which thus includes the sexual violence charges stipulated above.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to acquit Balaj on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Balaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. Balaj was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 after retrial.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-84

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Lahi Brahimaj ("Haradinaj et al.")

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Kunarac Ordering/Instigating Retrial Unreliable Testimony

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Lahi Brahimaj
    Charges
    Brahimaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02 and Witness 61.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Brahimaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was found, by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, not guilty of the charges of sexual violence against him.
    sentencing
    Brahimaj was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to hold Brahimaj not guilty on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Brahimaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. He was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 for the charges in the re-trial indictment and thus for the remaining sexual violence charge.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-84

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Milojica Kos (Kvocka et al. "Omarska, Keraterm & Trnopolje Camps")

    Year
    2001
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Sexual Slavery Forced Nudity Inhuman Treatment Akayesu Torture Forced Prostitution Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Kunarac Rape

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Milojica Kos
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kos was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity Kos was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Kos was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment on 2 November 2001.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    No appeal in this case.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Miroslav Kvocka (“Kvocka et al.”)

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Cumulative Conviction Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Forced to watch Rape Forced Nudity Foreseeable Consequence Mental Harm Persecution on Sexual Grounds Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Miroslav Kvocka (“Kvocka et al.”)
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp; - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kvocka was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity. Kvocka was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    sentencing
    Kvocka was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 7 years’ imprisonment on 28 February 2005 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Although Kvocka was initially found guilty by the Trial Chamber of persecution as a crime against humanity for the sexual violence crimes, this conviction was reversed by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Mlado Radic (Kvocka et al. "Omarska, Keraterm & Trnopolje Camps")

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Forced Nudity Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Attempted Rape Threat of Rape Forced to watch Rape Forced Prostitution Akayesu Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Mlado Radic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE) for the rape of Witness K, the attempted rape of Witness J and the threat of rape or other forms of sexual violence committed against Witness F, Zlata Cikota and Sifeta Sušic in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Torture as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for the rape of Witness K, the attempted rape of Witness J and the threat of rape or other forms of sexual violence committed against Witness F, Zlata Cikota and Sifeta Sušic in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Radic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime Radic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Torture as a crime against humanity, - Rape as a crime against humanity and - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Radic received a sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment on 28 February 2005.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The conviction was upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Ramush Haradinaj ("Haradinaj et al.")

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Kunarac Unreliable Testimony Retrial

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Ramush Haradinaj
    Charges
    Haradinaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Haradinaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was acquitted on all charges against him by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, thus all of the sexual violence charges stipulated above.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to acquit Haradinaj on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Haradinaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. Haradinaj was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 after retrial.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-84

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Simo Zaric (Simic et al. "Bosanski Samac")

    Year
    2003
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Forced Oral Sex Forced Nudity Urination Forced to watch Rape Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/781/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Simo Zaric
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (aiding and abetting), which included sexual assaults of detainees (constituting torture) of non-Serb civilians in the municipality of Bosanski Samac.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Zaric was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 17 October 2003 of:- Persecution as a crime against humanity. Judge Per-Johan Lindholm dissented from the Trial Chamber’s Judgement as to the mode of liability; according to the Judge, Zaric, like co-accused Simic, was liable under JCE I.
    sentencing
    Zaric was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment on 17 October 2003 by the Trial Chamber.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Zaric did not appeal the Trial Chamber’s judgment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-9

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Zoran Zigic (“Kvocka et al.”)

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Cumulative Conviction Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Forced Nudity Forced to watch Rape Mental Harm Persecution on Sexual Grounds Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Zoran Zigic (“Kvocka et al.”)
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Zigic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE). Zigic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime.
    sentencing
    Zigic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 25 years’ imprisonment on 28 February 2005 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Although Zigic was initially found guilty by the Trial Chamber of persecution as a crime against humanity for the sexual violence crimes, this conviction was reversed by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence non-judicial mechanisms

    International Commission of Inquiry on Guinea

    Country
    Guinea
    Keywords
    Rape Humiliating and Degrading Treatment Forced Nudity Sexual Slavery Killings

    Reference link
    www.legal-tools.org/en/browse/record/c5939f/
    Research focus
    Causality, Functionality and Logic of Conflict-related Sexual Violence
    Type of mechanism
    Commission of Inquiry
    Name of mechanism
    International Commission of Inquiry on Guinea
    Status
    2715
    Findings
    On 28 September 2009, the red berets and gendarmes surrounded the stadium, blocked the exits, stormed through the main gates, fired tear gas and set about killing or wounding the demonstrators or subjecting them to sexual assault. In under two hours, hundreds of civilians had died or been seriously wounded, stripped in public and subjected to widespread sexual abuse, being unable to flee as the exits from the stadium had been blocked. The authorities then began an organized attempt to cover up the crimes and, as a result, at least 89 persons have been reported missing, some are suffering from permanent injuries, while others will be afflicted with long-term physical and mental suffering. Among the many crimes the COI confirmed (e.g. killings), it also confirmed that at least 109 women were subjected to (gang) rape and other sexual violence, including sexual mutilation and sexual slavery. Several women died of their wounds following particularly cruel sexual attacks. Women were subjected to collective rape, often involving the use of objects, in public places, and all these acts were committed over a period of less than two hours, mainly in one place, in full view and with the full knowledge of all those who were present.
    Recommendations
    On 18 December 2009, the COI recommended, <i>inter alia</i>, that the Guinean Government should be strongly urged to provide the families concerned with all relevant information on the case of persons who have disappeared, that the International Criminal Court should be asked to investigate the persons alleged to have committed crimes against humanity, that adequate reparation should be made to the victims and that targeted sanctions should be imposed against the principal perpetrators of the violations.&nbsp; <b>The COI qualified the acts committed as: (1) violations of human rights and (2) violations of international criminal law.</b> As for the violations of human rights it held that the sexual slavery to which a number of women were subjected constitutes, <i>inter alia</i>, a <i>violation of the prohibition against holding anyone in slavery or servitude </i>(Article 8 of the ICCPR). The at least 109 women who were found subjected to sexual violence were held to be grave violations of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, i.e. <i>torture</i> (Article 1). These acts inflicted “severe pain or suffering” in order to punish the victims for an act which they had committed (participation in a demonstration prohibited by the Government) and to intimidate them, particularly to deter them from demonstrating against the authorities in the future. The persons responsible for these acts were soldiers, gendarmes, policemen and militiamen. The latter clearly acted “at the instigation of [a public official] or with the consent or acquiescence [of a public official]” since they were operating in conjunction with the security forces which were engaged in repression. Some of these acts, such as stripping women naked in public or certain less severe types of aggression, may be categorized as <i>cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment</i>, the COI stated. These acts of sexual violence were also considered <i>violations of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women</i>, since they were clearly directed against women as such. As for the violations of international criminal law, the COI held that it was established that <i>crimes against humanity</i> had been committed, <i>including rape, sexual slavery and sexual violence</i>. The COI referred to the Rome Statute for the prohibition of rape and other forms of sexual violence as a crime against humanity (Article 7(1)(g)).
    Date of report / release
    1909-12-18
    Reparations / awards
    <p style="text-align:justify; line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US">As for the reparations, specific mention was made of the victims of sexual violence. It was held that victims should receive, e.g.: </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify; line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US">(1) medical treatment and adequate care, in particular for the victims of sexual violence, who should be given treatment for HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases; and </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify; line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US">(2) psychological counselling, particularly for victims of gender-based violence, especially rape and sexual violence.</span></p>

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).