Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 11 to 20 of 24 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Iraqi High Tribunal - Abdullah Kadhim Ruwayid (“Saddam Hussein Al Majeed et al.”)

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Socio-cultural Context of Sexual Violence
    Country
    Iraq
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Shame Use of Euphemistic Language

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/187
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Iraqi High Tribunal (IHT)
    Name of accused
    Abdullah Kadhim Ruwayid
    Charges
    Ruwayid was indicted on 31 July 2005 for different charges of crimes against humanity, including torture (based on the Rome Statute provision) by aiding and abetting the senior defendants’ (Hussein, Hassan and Ramadan) joint criminal enterprise, which seemed to include sexual violence as found in the factual findings in the Judgement.The indictment was based on the response of the President and his staff on the July 1982 event. In July 1982, a convoy carrying Saddam Hussein was fired upon by unknown individuals as it was visiting the town of Al Dujail. In response to what the President perceived as an assassination attempt but which did not injure anyone, a systematic attack was launched against the residents of Al Dujail as they were fired upon from aircraft and their property was destroyed. A Revolutionary Court sentenced 148 residents to death without trial for their alleged involvement in the assassination attempt. Of those that were hanged, the Tribunal identified a number of children. Countless others died in detention, as a result of torture at the hand of the Investigation Services, or from malnutrition, lack of access to medical care and poor hygienic conditions. Many rapes and other forms of sexual violence committed against women took place in detention.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 5 November 2006, Ruwayid was convicted. The conviction included torture as a crime against humanity, which encompassed several instances of rape and other forms of sexual violence. [it is not entirely clear how the sexual violence was ultimately convicted, but it seems under ‘torture’ as a crime against humanity]
    sentencing
    Abdullah Ruwayid received a sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    1/E First/2005

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Iraqi High Tribunal - Ali Dayeh Ali (“Saddam Hussein Al Majeed et al.”)

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Socio-cultural Context of Sexual Violence
    Country
    Iraq
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Shame Use of Euphemistic Language

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/187
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Iraqi High Tribunal (IHT)
    Name of accused
    Ali Dayeh Ali
    Charges
    Ali was indicted (on 31 July 2005) for different charges of crimes against humanity, including torture (based on the Rome Statute provision) by aiding and abetting the senior defendants’ (Hussein, Hassan and Ramadan) joint criminal enterprise, which seemed to include sexual violence as found in the factual findings in the Judgement.The indictment was based on the response of the President and his staff on the July 1982 event. In July 1982, a convoy carrying Saddam Hussein was fired upon by unknown individuals as it was visiting the town of Al Dujail. In response to what the President perceived as an assassination attempt but which did not injure anyone, a systematic attack was launched against the residents of Al Dujail as they were fired upon from aircraft and their property was destroyed. A Revolutionary Court sentenced 148 residents to death without trial for their alleged involvement in the assassination attempt. Of those that were hanged, the Tribunal identified a number of children. Countless others died in detention, as a result of torture at the hand of the Investigation Services, or from malnutrition, lack of access to medical care and poor hygienic conditions. Many rapes and other forms of sexual violence committed against women took place in detention.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 5 November 2006, Ali was convicted. The conviction included torture as a crime against humanity, which encompassed several instances of rape and other forms of sexual violence. [it is not entirely clear how the sexual violence was ultimately convicted, but it seems under ‘torture’ as a crime against humanity]
    sentencing
    Ali received a sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    1/E First/2005

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Iraqi High Tribunal - Barazan Ibrahim Hassan (“Saddam Hussein Al Majeed et al.”)

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Socio-cultural Context of Sexual Violence
    Country
    Iraq
    Keywords
    Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Use of Euphemistic Language Shame Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/187
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Iraqi High Tribunal (IHT)
    Name of accused
    Barazan Ibrahim Hassan
    Charges
    Hassan was indicted on 31 July 2005 for committing (via a JCE) different charges of crimes against humanity, including torture and other inhumane acts (based on the Rome Statute provisions) under Article 12 of the IHT Statute, which seemed to include sexual violence as found in the factual findings in the Judgement.The indictment was based on the response of the President and his staff on the July 1982 event. In July 1982, a convoy carrying Saddam Hussein was fired upon by unknown individuals as it was visiting the town of Al Dujail. In response to what the President perceived as an assassination attempt but which did not injure anyone, a systematic attack was launched against the residents of Al Dujail as they were fired upon from aircraft and their property was destroyed. A Revolutionary Court sentenced 148 residents to death without trial for their alleged involvement in the assassination attempt. Of those that were hanged, the Tribunal identified a number of children. Countless others died in detention, as a result of torture at the hand of the Investigation Services, or from malnutrition, lack of access to medical care and poor hygienic conditions. Many rapes and other forms of sexual violence committed against women took place in detention.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 5 November 2006, Hassan was convicted by the IHT. The conviction included torture and other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, which encompassed several instances of rape and other forms of sexual violence. [it is not entirely clear how the sexual violence was ultimately convicted, but it seems under ‘torture’ and/or ‘other inhumane acts’ as a crime against humanity].
    sentencing
    Hassan received a death sentence by hanging.
    Status
    2715
    Findings
    Case number
    1/E First/2005

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Iraqi High Tribunal - Mizher Abdullah Kadhim Ruwayid (“Saddam Hussein Al Majeed et al.”)

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Socio-cultural Context of Sexual Violence
    Country
    Iraq
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Shame Use of Euphemistic Language

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/187
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Iraqi High Tribunal (IHT)
    Name of accused
    Mizher Abdullah Kadhim Ruwayid
    Charges
    Ruwayid was indicted on 31 July 2005 for different charges of crimes against humanity, including torture (based on the Rome Statute provision) by aiding and abetting the senior defendants’ (Hussein, Hassan and Ramadan) joint criminal enterprise, which seemed to include sexual violence as found in the factual findings in the Judgement.The indictment was based on the response of the President and his staff on the July 1982 event. In July 1982, a convoy carrying Saddam Hussein was fired upon by unknown individuals as it was visiting the town of Al Dujail. In response to what the President perceived as an assassination attempt but which did not injure anyone, a systematic attack was launched against the residents of Al Dujail as they were fired upon from aircraft and their property was destroyed. A Revolutionary Court sentenced 148 residents to death without trial for their alleged involvement in the assassination attempt. Of those that were hanged, the Tribunal identified a number of children. Countless others died in detention, as a result of torture at the hand of the Investigation Services, or from malnutrition, lack of access to medical care and poor hygienic conditions. Many rapes and other forms of sexual violence committed against women took place in detention.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 5 November 2006, Ruwayid was convicted. The conviction included torture as a crime against humanity, which encompassed several instances of rape and other forms of sexual violence. [it is not entirely clear how the sexual violence was ultimately convicted, but it seems under ‘torture’ as a crime against humanity]
    sentencing
    Mizher Ruwayid received a sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    1/E First/2005

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Iraqi High Tribunal - Saddam Hussein Al Majeed (“Saddam Hussein Al Majeed et al.”)

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Socio-cultural Context of Sexual Violence
    Country
    Iraq
    Keywords
    Detention Centers Sexual Violence Use of Euphemistic Language Shame Rape/Sexual Violence in Prison

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/187
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Iraqi High Tribunal (IHT)
    Name of accused
    Saddam Hussein Al Majeed
    Charges
    Hussein was indicted on 31 July 2005 for committing different charges of crimes against humanity, including torture and other inhumane acts (based on the Rome Statute provisions) under Article 12 of the IHT Statute, which seemed to include sexual violence as found in the factual findings in the Judgement.The indictment was based on the response of the President and his staff on the July 1982 event. In July 1982, a convoy carrying Saddam Hussein was fired upon by unknown individuals as it was visiting the town of Al Dujail. In response to what the President perceived as an assassination attempt but which did not injure anyone, a systematic attack was launched against the residents of Al Dujail as they were fired upon from aircraft and their property was destroyed. A Revolutionary Court sentenced 148 residents to death without trial for their alleged involvement in the assassination attempt. Of those that were hanged, the Tribunal identified a number of children. Countless others died in detention, as a result of torture at the hand of the Investigation Services, or from malnutrition, lack of access to medical care and poor hygienic conditions. Many rapes and other forms of sexual violence committed against women took place in detention.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 5 November 2006, Saddam Hussein was convicted by the IHT. The conviction included torture and other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, which encompassed several instances of rape and other forms of sexual violence. [it is not entirely clear how the sexual violence was ultimately convicted, but it seems under ‘torture’ and/or ‘other inhumane acts’ as a crime against humanity]
    sentencing
    Hussein received a death sentence by hanging.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    1/C 1/2005

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Iraqi High Tribunal - Taha Yassin Ramadan (“Saddam Hussein Al Majeed et al.”)

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Socio-cultural Context of Sexual Violence
    Country
    Iraq
    Keywords
    Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Use of Euphemistic Language Shame

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/187
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Iraqi High Tribunal (IHT)
    Name of accused
    Taha Yassin Ramadan
    Charges
    Ramadan was indicted on 31 July 2005 for committing (via a JCE) different charges of crimes against humanity, including torture and other inhumane acts (based on the Rome Statute provisions) under Article 12 of the IHT Statute, which seemed to include sexual violence as found in the factual findings in the Judgement.The indictment was based on the response of the President and his staff on the July 1982 event. In July 1982, a convoy carrying Saddam Hussein was fired upon by unknown individuals as it was visiting the town of Al Dujail. In response to what the President perceived as an assassination attempt but which did not injure anyone, a systematic attack was launched against the residents of Al Dujail as they were fired upon from aircraft and their property was destroyed. A Revolutionary Court sentenced 148 residents to death without trial for their alleged involvement in the assassination attempt. Of those that were hanged, the Tribunal identified a number of children. Countless others died in detention, as a result of torture at the hand of the Investigation Services, or from malnutrition, lack of access to medical care and poor hygienic conditions. Many rapes and other forms of sexual violence committed against women took place in detention.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 5 November 2006, Ramadan was convicted by the IHT. The conviction included torture and other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, which encompassed several instances of rape and other forms of sexual violence. [it is not entirely clear how the sexual violence was ultimately convicted, but it seems under ‘torture’ and/or ‘other inhumane acts’ as a crime against humanity]
    sentencing
    Ramadan received a death sentence by hanging.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    1/E First/2005

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Boban Simsic

    Year
    2007
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Detention Centers Humiliating and Degrading Treatment Persecution on Sexual Grounds Rape Sexual Violence, Persecution Sexual Violence, Torture Aiding

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1187
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Boban Simsic
    Charges
    Simsic was charged on 8 July 2005 (indictment confirmed) with persecution as a crime against humanity, including sexual violence (Article 172(1)(h) read with subparagraph (g) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina) for: (i) in the second half of June 1992, at the Fire Brigade premises in Višegrad, together with two Serbian soldiers, taking part in the harassment and rapes of ten girls and women of Bosniak ethnicity; (ii) whenSimsic was a guard at the facility of the Hasan Veletovac elementary school during the second half of June 1992, when Bosniak civilians were detained at the school, Simsic either on his own or together with other members of the Serbian army, police and paramilitary formations took part in the rape of a number of girls and young women.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 11 July 2006, the Court rendered the first instance verdict finding the accused guilty of persecution as a crime against humanity, including sexual violence and sentencing him to 5 years’ imprisonment. The panel found the accused guilty of aiding in the enforced disappearance and rape of Bosniak civilians in the Hasan Veletovac school premises in Visegrad, which occurred as part of a widespread and systematic attack by the Serb Army, police and paramilitary groups directed against the Bosniac civilian population in the area of Visegrad between April and July 1992. The panel, however, found the accused not guilty of participation in attacks on villages Zljieb, Velji Lug and Kuka (municipality of Visegrad), illegal arrests and confinement, murder, rape, torture and infliction of serious injury or physical suffering to, and seizure of property of confined Bosniak civilians in the area of Visegrad between April and July 1992.
    sentencing
    At first instance Simsic was sentenced to 5 years' imprisonment. This, however, was increased to 14 year by the Appellate Panel.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 5 January 2007, the Appellate Panel rendered a decision upholding the appeals filed by the Prosecutor’s Office of BiH and Defense and revoking the Trial Panel’s verdict. The same decision orders a retrial before the Appellate Panel. On 14 August 2007, the Appellate Panel handed down the final verdict finding Simsic guilty of persecution as a crime against humanity, including sexual violence and sentencing him to 14 years’ imprisonment. The Appellate Panel found that in the second half of June 1992, as a guard securing several hundred detained Bosniak civilians in the Hasan Veletovac Elementary School, together with other members of the Serb army, police, and paramilitary formations, Simsic participated in killings, enforced disappearance, and torture of detainees. He also aided in the coercing of girls and young women to sexual intercourse. In addition, on several occasions, Simsic took girls and younger women to other members of the Serb army who perpetrated multiple rapes, beatings and humiliation on them. Simsic was acquitted of the count which alleged that, on an undetermined date in the second half of June 1992, he took five girls and five younger women from the room in which Bosniak civilians were detained in the Fire Station in Visegrad, moving them to another room where, together with two Serb soldiers, he beat them and took turns raping them.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRZ-05/04

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Radovan Stankovic

    Year
    2007
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Children Sentencing and Reparations
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Torture Forced to watch Rape Incitement

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/3259
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Radovan Stankovic
    Charges
    Stankovic was charged (on 3 March 2003 as amended on 8 December 2003) with crimes against humanity, including rape (Articles 172(1)(c), (e), (f) and (g) of the Criminal Code of BiH) for having set up a detention centre for (often under aged) women, having incited other soldiers to rape detainees, and having coerced several detainees into forced labor and sexual intercourse.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 14 November 2006, the Court of BiH found Stankovic guilty for crimes against humanity, including enslavement, imprisonment, torture and rape for: (i) Establishing a detention centre (“Karaman’s House”), detaining at least nine female persons and inciting soldiers to rape them; (ii) Compelling detainees to forced labor, inside and outside of the detention center; (iii) Repeatedly raping a detainee, compelling her to forced labor at several locations and having her witness him raping her under aged sister; (iv) Raping a detainee at another detention centre. Stankovic was sentenced to sixteen years’ imprisonment.
    sentencing
    The Appellate Panel increased the sentence from 16 to 20 years' imprisonment. Shortly afterwards, Stankovic escaped from jail. He was recaptured in January 2012. he was then sentenced to another two Year' imprisonment for using force while escaping.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The prosecution appealed against the sentence of 16 years’ imprisonment and the acquittal of one of the charges (forcibly taking a female patient from a hospital in Foca and raping her). Stankovic himself basically contested all the Court’s findings, most notably stating that the witness statements were false and fabricated. On 28 March 2007, the Appellate Panel left intact the entire verdict, though it raised the sentence to 20 years’ imprisonment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRZ-05/70

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Rasim Delic

    Year
    2008
    Issues
    Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Unclear Indictment Detention Centers

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/679/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Rasim Delic
    Charges
    Delic was charged with: - Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(3) (command responsibility) for the sexual assault of Witnesses DRW-1, DRW-2 and DRW-3, detained at the Kamenica camp. - Rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for the same crimes as above.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Delic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber on 15 September 2008 of: - Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(3) (command responsibility) for the sexual assault of Witnesses DRW-1, DRW-2 and DRW-3, detained at the Kamenica camp. The Trial Chamber held that these victims were subjected to sexual violence at the Vatrostalna facility, but not at the Kamenica camp, as was pleaded in the indictment. - Rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for the same crimes as above. However, for this charge Delic was already acquitted during trial on 26 February 2008. Both the Prosecution and Defense agreed to this and the Prosecution has even asked earlier on in the proceedings for a withdrawal of the charge.
    sentencing
    Delic was therefore sentenced by the Trial Chamber to 3 years’ imprisonment on 15 September 2008 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    During the appellate proceedings, on 16 April 2010, Delic died while on provisional release. On 29 June 2010, the Appeals Chamber terminated the appellate proceedings and ruled that Trial Chamber Judgement to be final.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-83

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Oslo District Court - Mirsad Repak

    Year
    2008
    Issues
    Sentencing and Reparations Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Norway
    Keywords
    Acquittal Domestic Law Humiliating and Degrading Treatment Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Complicity Reparation Detention Centers Foreseeable Consequence

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/36
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Oslo District Court
    Name of accused
    Mirsad Repak
    Charges
    Repak was charged with crimes against humanity and war crimes, which both included sexual violence (including of both women and men) under Article 97 of the Norwegian Constitution.
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Court observed that Article 97 of the Norwegian Constitution prohibits any retroactive application of the law unless similar legislation existed at the time of the alleged crimes. The Court ruled that prosecution was possible since the actions described in the indictment were punishable under the Criminal Code in force in 1992 (the time of the crimes). Repak was therefore found guilty of war crimes, including rape (paras. 158-164), but was acquitted for the charges of crimes against humanity, as there was no comparable legislation in 1992.
    sentencing
    Repak was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 11 March 2010, the Norway Court of Appeal reduced Repak’s sentence from 5 to 4,5 years’ imprisonment. On 3 December 2010 the Supreme Court of Norway overturned the conviction against Repak and finally released him. The Supreme Court ruled that the Law on War Crimes of March 2008 could not be applied retroactively to acts committed in 1992. The Court concluded that the retroactive application of the Law on War Crimes would violate Article 97 of the Norwegian Constitution. He was thus acquitted for the charges of war crimes. However, on 14 April 2011, the Supreme Court of Norway found him guilty for unlawful deprivation of liberty and detention of civilians in violation of Section 223(1) and (2) of the 1905 Norwegian Penal Code and sentenced him to eight years in prison. Repak was found guilty on thirteen counts. The indictment charged him with taking part in depriving civilians of liberty and detaining them at the Dretelj detention camp and severe mistreatment of detainees, including sexual abuse, brutal violence, intimidation and humiliation, and deprivation of adequate access to food. The Court concluded that Repak had acted with intent or complicity in the offences, or alternatively could have foreseen the consequences regarding the atrocities suffered by the victims, a level sufficient to find guilt under Section 43 of the Penal Code. According to the sentencing Judge, Repak ‘played a central role in allowing the extensive and sometimes extremely brutal atrocities against the 13 victims to take place’.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    08-018985MED-OTIR/08
    Reparations / awards
    Repak was ordered to pay damages of a total of NKO 400,000 (approximately 51,000 euro) to the families of eight Serbian victims. However, as far as compensation to victims of sexual violence is concerned, the Court ruled that “As regards compensation of economic loss, it is essential for the Court to emphasize that the defendant is only liable for damages where there is a causal relationship between the acts of the defendant and the damage. This means that the defendant is not liable to pay compensation for the extensive damage caused by rapes and gross violence committed by others.”

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).