Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing all 3 results.
  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    East Timor - Egidio Manek et al.

    Year
    2003
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    East Timor
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Definition of Rape Consent Accused at large

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1061/Manek-et-al/
    Type of mechanism
    District Court
    Name of mechanism
    Special Panels for Serious Crime Panels in East Timor (SPSC)
    Name of accused
    Egidio Manek et al.
    Charges
    Of the 14 indicted, four individuals were charged with rape as a crime against humanity (Section 5(1)(g) UNTAET Regulation 2000/15), namely Egidio Manek (Deputy Commander), Olivio Tatoo Bau (member of the Laksaur militia, Tilomar/Salele), Americo Bau (or Mali) (idem), and Gabriel Nahak (member of the Laksaur militia, Leogore, Suai Kota). All under Section 14 UNTAET Regulation 2000/15 (committing, ordering, soliciting or inducing, aiding, abetting or otherwise assisting). However, the indictment never led to any trial before a court in East Timor, owing to the continued absence of the accused from the country. Accused at large. There is no final decision in this case and the Special Panel was closed down in 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    09/CG/TDD/2003

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    IACtHR - Raquel Marti de Mejía v. Peru

    Year
    1996
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Peru
    Keywords
    Discrimination Definition of Rape Outrages upon Personal Dignity Right to an Effective Remedy State Responsibility Rape, Torture Private Life

    Reference link
    http://cidh.org/annualrep/95eng/Peru10970.htm
    Type of mechanism
    Regional court
    Name of mechanism
    Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    Status
    2715
    Findings
    The IACHR acknowledged that rape could rise to the level of torture, an aggravated form of inhumane treatment, which is prohibited by Article 5(2) of the ACHR. The Court held that rape constitutes torture, in line with the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane and Degrading Treatment or Punishment, if the rape was: “1) an intentional act through which physical and mental pain and suffering is inflicted on a person; 2) committed with a purpose; and 3) committed by a public official or by a private person acting at the instigation of the former.” As to the case of Mejía, the IACtHR established that rape as torture had been committed against her: “Raquel Mejía was a victim of rape, which caused her physical and mental pain and suffering (…) [She] was raped with the aim of punishing her personally and intimidating her (…) [T]he man who raped [her] was a member of the security forces.” The IACtHR thus concluded that the rape of Mejía amounted to torture and since an official of the Peruvian state perpetrated the rape, the IACtHR attributed responsibility for the rape to Peru. The IACtHR urged Peru to punish the perpetrators and pay the victim fair compensation. In addition, the IACtHR also emphasized that rape not only constitutes a severe violation of Article 5 of the ACHR, but also amounts to a violation of Article 11 of the ACHR (the right to privacy by safeguarding the right to have “honor respected” and “dignity recognized”). The IACtHR explained that it “considers that sexual abuse (…) implies a deliberate outrage to [the victim’s] dignity. In this respect, it becomes a question that is included in the concept of “private life”. The IACtHR concluded that the offender abrogated Mejía’s right to privacy when he raped her. It attributed responsibility for the Article 11 violations to the Peruvian state because a public official perpetrated the rape and encouraged Peru to hold the offenders accountable. Lastly, the IACtHR held that Peru’s failure to act with due diligence in guaranteeing Mrs. Mejía’s right to an effective judicial recourse for the human rights violations she and her husband, Mr. Mejía, suffered constituted a violation of Articles 1(1) (Right to non-discrimination), 8(1) (Right to due process), and 25 (Right to an effective recourse) of the ACHR.
    Case number
    Case 10.970
    Reparations / awards
    The IACtHR attributed responsibility for the rape to Peru. The IACtHR urged Peru to punish the perpetrators and pay the victim fair compensation.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICC - Germain Katanga

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability Sentencing and Reparations Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
    Keywords
    Acquittal Common Purpose Forced Marriage Forced Nudity Definition of Rape Withdrawal of Charges Severance of Charges

    Reference link
    https://www.icc-cpi.int/drc/katanga
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Court
    Name of accused
    Germain Katanga
    Charges
    Initially, Katanga was charged (together with Chui) with crimes against humanity and war crimes, including sexual slavery, committed on 24 February 2003 during the attack on the village of Bogoro, in the Ituri district of the DRC. Although subsequent events resulted in withdrawal of the sexual slavery counts as evidence from two victims/witnesses of sexual violence substantiating these counts was excluded by the Court because of security concerns, a change in their security situation made it possible for the Prosecutor to reinstate the sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and a war crime counts and add charges of rape as a crime against humanity and a war crime as well as outrages upon personal dignity as a war crime on 12 June 2008 (Prosecution’s Submission, 12 June 2008). According to the amended document containing the charges, in its section elaborating on ‘sexual offences’ (Prosecution’s Amended Document, 12 June 2008, para. 89): “women, who were captured at Bogoro and spared because they hid their ethnicity, were raped, sexually enslaved or humiliated. Threatened with death by the combatants, one woman was stripped and forced to parade half naked in front of them. Others were raped and forcibly taken to military camps. Once there, they were sometimes given as a ‘wife’ to their captors or kept in the camp’s prison, which was a hole dug in the ground. The women detained in these prisons were repeatedly raped by soldiers and commanders alike and also by soldiers who were punished and sent to prison. The fate reserved to captured women was widely known. Shortly after the Bogoro attack, KATANGA saw one of the imprisoned women detained in such conditions in one of the FRPI camps.” On 30 September 2008, the Chamber confirmed the charges against Katanga (and Chui) for rape and sexual slavery as crimes against humanity and war crimes under Article 25(3)(d), but declined to confirm the charge of outrages upon personal dignity as a war crime as, the Chamber held, the link to the suspect was lacking (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, 30 September 2008). On 21 November 2012, the Court severed the charges against Katanga and Chui.
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Judgement against Katanga was pronounced on 7 March 2014 and although he was convicted for several other crimes against humanity and war crimes under Article 25(3)(d), he was acquitted for the sexual violence charges. The Chamber unanimously found Katanga not guilty of contributing to the acts of sexual violence as they did not believe these crimes formed part of the common purpose of the attack, unlike the crimes of directing an attack against a civilian population, pillage, murder and destruction of property as war crimes/crimes against humanity.
    sentencing
    A total sentence of 12 years’ imprisonment was given on 23 May 2014 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 13 November 2015, a Panel of three Judges of the Appeals Chamber, specifically appointed by the Appeals Chamber, reviewed Katanga’s sentence and decided to reduce it. Accordingly, the date for the completion of his sentence was set to 18 January 2016. Decisions on possible victim reparations, which might have an impact on victims of sexual violence, will be rendered later.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICC-01/04-01/07

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).