Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 1 to 10 of 20 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Askraba Dordislav

    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Rape Sexual Violence Enforced Disappearance Rape Camps Torture Rape as a Weapon of War War Crimes Crimes Against Humanity

    Reference link
    http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/predmet/2463/show
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Ratko Bundalo, Nedo Zeljaja, Dordislav Askraba
    Charges
    Ratko Bundalo and Nedo Zeljaja were charged with the criminal offense of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172 (1) (h) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CC BiH) in conjunction with the following items:a) depriving another person of his life (murder),b) extermination,d) deportation or forcible transfer of population,e) imprisonment,f) torture,g) sexual violence, andk) other inhumane acts,in conjunction with Article 173 (1) (c), (e) and (f) of the CC BiH, all in conjunction with Article 180 (1) of the CC BiH.Dordislav Askraba is charged with the criminal offense of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172 (1) (h) of the CC BiH in conjunction with the following items:a) depriving another person of his life (murder),e) imprisonment,f) torture, andk) other inhumane actsin conjunction with Article 180 (1) of CC BiH.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 21 December 2009, the Trial Panel reached the first-instance verdict finding the accused, Ratko Bundalo and Nedo Zeljaja guilty of crimes against humanity. The accused Ratko Bundalo was sentenced to 19 years of imprisonment, the accused Nedo Zeljaja was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment, and the accused Dordislav Askraba was acquitted on all counts of the Indictment.
    sentencing
    The Trial Chamber sentenced Ratko Bundalo to 19 years of imprisonment and Nedo Zeljaja to 15 years of imprisonment. The Appeals Chamber found Dordislav Askraba guilty of war crimes and sentenced him to 7 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 18 April 2012, the Panel of the Appellate pronounced the second instance verdict finding the accused Dordislav Askraba guilty of war crimes against civilians, committed in the manner described in the operative provision of the verdict, in violation of Article 142(1) of the Criminal Code of SFRY as adopted pursuant to the Law on Application of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Criminal Code of the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia, in conjunction with Articles 22 and 24 of the same Code. The verdict sentenced the accused to imprisonment of 7 years.Following new appeals by the of Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Defense Counsel for the Accused Dordislav Askraba, the Appeals Chamber upheld the second-instance verdict on 18 June 2013.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    S1 1 K 005159 11 Kzz

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Milisavljevic Predrag et al.

    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Enforced Disappearance Rape Torture Military Perpetrator Crimes Against Humanity

    Reference link
    http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/predmet/3013/show
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Milisavljevic Predrag, Pantelic Milos, Tasic Ljubomir
    Charges
    Crimes Against Humanity pursuant to Article 172 CC BiH, in conjunction with Article 180(1) CC of BiH.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 28 October 2018, the Trial Panel of the Section I for War Crimes of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found Predrag Milisavljevic and Milos Pantelic guilty of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1) (h) as read with (a) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Accused were sentenced to imprisonment of 20 years each. Predrag Milisavljevic was furthermore acquitted of the charges of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), as read with (f) and (g) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina, all in conjunction with Article 180(1) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Milos Pantelic was also acquitted of the charges of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h) as read with (e), (f), (h) and (k) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The trial Chamber acquitted Predrag Milisavljevic, Milos Pantelic and Ljubomir Tasic of the charges of crimes against humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h) as read with (d) and (e) in conjunction with Article 29 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    sentencing
    The Trial Chamber sentenced Predrag Milisavljevic to 20 years imprisonment and acquitted Ljubomir Tasic of all charges. The Appeals Chamber sentenced Milos Pantelic to 15 years imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 23 July 2015, the Appellate Division Panel of Section I for War Crimes of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina sent out the second-instance verdict of 2 June 2015 in the case of Predrag Milisavljevic et al., which, in their entirety, refused the appeals filed by the Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina and by defense counsel for the accused Predrag Milisavljevic. The appeal filed by defense counsel for the accused Milos Pantelic was however, partly granted. Milos Pantelic, concerning the criminal offense of crimes against humanity, was accordingly sentenced to 15 (fifteen) years of imprisonment. The remaining part of the first-instance verdict was upheld.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    S1 1 K 011128 12 Krz

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ECCC - Im Chaem

    Country
    Cambodia
    Keywords
    Crimes Against Humanity Forced Marriage Sexual Violence

    Reference link
    https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/case/topic/case0401
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
    Name of accused
    Im Chaem
    Charges
    Im Chaem was initially charged with crimes against humanity and violations of the 1956 Penal Code. Additional allegations were however submitted in five supplementary submissions filed which included allegations of Forced Marriage and Sexual Violence.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    004/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Aloys Ntabakuze (Bagasora et al. “Military I”)

    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Crimes Against Humanity Genocide Sexual Violence Tutsi War Crimes Rape as Crime Against Humanity

    Reference link
    Click here
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Aloys Ntabakuze
    Charges
    Ntabakuze had been charged with sexual violence crimes: i.e. conspiracy to commit genocide, genocide, complicity in genocide, rape as a crime against humanity, persecution as a crime against humanity, other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, violence to health and to the physical or mental well-being of civilians as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, rape and indecent assault as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for: (i) rapes, sexual assaults and other crimes of a sexual nature committed against Tutsi women and girls throughout Rwanda, including at the secondary nursing school in Kabgayi, in Gitarama prefecture;(ii) the sexual assault of Prime Minister Agathe Uwilingiyimana
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ntabakuze was found not guilty for the sexual violence crimes under these counts by the Trial Chamber (on 18 December 2008).
    sentencing
    Ntabakuze was given a sentence of 35 years’ imprisonment on 8 May 2012 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The acquittal for the sexual violence was not appealed by the Prosecution.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-41

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Casimir Bizimungu (Bizimungu et al. “Government II”)

    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Crimes Against Humanity Genocide Prevention Tutsi War Crimes

    Reference link
    Click here
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Casimir Bizimungu
    Charges
    Bizimungu was charged with sexual violence as follows:Genocide or, alternatively, complicity in genocide and rape as a crime against humanity as well as outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for failing to prevent or to punish the rapes of Tutsi women and students committed by soldiers and Interahamwe at the secondary nursing school in Kabgayi in Gitarama prefecture.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Mid-trial, in 2005, Bizimungu was acquitted of the sexual violence charges due to a lack of evidence (See the Decision on Defense Motions Pursuant to Rule 98bis).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Bizimungu was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 30 September 2011 (on all counts).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-99-50

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Ildephonse Nizeyimana

    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Crimes Against Humanity Gang Rape Genocide Tutsi War Crimes

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-00-55c
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Ildephonse Nizeyimana
    Charges
    The charges concerned:Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide, rape as a crime against humanity and rape as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Articles 6(1) and 6(3) for: (i) ordering FAR soldiers, gendarmes and officers stationed at both Ngoma Camp and ESO to rape tutsi women and for the subsequent rapes (ordering); and for (ii) ordering or instigating soldiers from the FAR, ESO, Ngoma Camp, Butare Gendarmerie Camp and Interahamwe militia to rape Tutsi women at Butare Hospital, Butare University and at various locations in Butare prefecture, including the residence of Rosalie Gicanda, and for the subsequent rapes, including the multiple rapes and gang-rapes of MKA, ZBL, BUQ, BJW and DCO (ordering or instigating).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Nizeyimana was charged with sexual violence crimes, the Trial Chamber (on 19 June 2012) held that no factual allegations supporting Nizeyimana’s liability for these crimes had been proven. Therefore, the counts were dismissed.
    sentencing
    Nizeyimana was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment on 29 September 2014 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Prosecution partly appealed these findings on sexual violence. However, the Appeals Chamber found that the Prosecution had failed to show that the Trial Chamber erred in finding that the perpetrators of the rapes at Butare Hospital were not sufficiently identified as ESO soldiers and, therefore, that it could not hold Nizeyimana liable as a superior on this basis. For these reasons, the Appeals Chamber needed not to consider the Prosecution’s arguments on whether Nizeyimana failed to prevent or punish his subordinates for the rapes committed at Butare Hospital. Based on the foregoing, the Appeals Chamber dismissed the Prosecution’s ground of Appeal.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-00-55C

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Military Court of South Kivu, DRC - The Kavumu Trial

    Country
    Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
    Keywords
    Murder Rape Crimes Against Humanity Article 25 of the Rome Statute Acting with a Common Purpose Democratic Republic of Congo Armed Group

    Reference link
    https://trialinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Arr%C3%AAt-final_Kavumu_CM.pdf
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court, Military Tribunal
    Name of mechanism
    The Military Court of South Kivu (Democratic Republic of Congo)
    Name of accused
    Frederic Rugimbanya Batumike and 19 others
    Charges
    18 of the defendants were charged with rape as a crime against humanity, murder and organization of and participation in a militia.
    sentencing
    The court sentenced 11 of the defendants, including Batumike, to life imprisonment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    RP0105/2017

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    The Extraordinary African Chambers - Hissène Habré

    Country
    Senegal
    Keywords
    Rape Crimes Against Humanity Article 25 of the Rome Statute Political Leaders Chad

    Reference link
    https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/supporting_resources/arret_integral.pdf
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    The Extraordinary African Chambers
    Name of accused
    Hissène Habré
    sentencing
    Habre was sentenced to life imprisonment on 27 April 2017.

  • Literature

    Moshan, Brook S. - Women, War, and Words...

    Year
    1998
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes

    Reference link
    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b222/525366f03084fb524513e54a5194b6ea81f0.pdf
    Full reference
    Moshan, Brook Sari, "Women, War, and Words: The Gender Component in the Permanent International Criminal Court’s Definition of Crimes Against Humanity", in Fordham International Law Journal, 1998, vol. 22, no.1, pp. 154-183.
    Type of literature
    Journal Article
    Research focus
    Gaps in the Jurisprudence and Legislation on Conflict-related Sexual Violence crimes
    Author
    Moshan, Brook S.
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Court

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Alfred Musema

    Year
    2001
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Crimes Against Humanity Genocidal Rape Mutilation

    Reference link
    http://www.unictr.org/en/cases/ictr-96-13
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Alfred Musema
    Charges
    Causing serious bodily and mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (committing and aiding and abetting), including raping a young Tutsi woman named Nyiramusugi, and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (committing) for raping Nyiramusugi.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Musema was convicted by the Trial Chamber (on 27 January 2000) for causing serious bodily and mental harm as genocide.
    sentencing
    The Appeals Chamber confirmed the sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions were reversed on appeal. The Appeals Chamber heard out-of-court statements of Witnesses CB and EB. It held that if these testimonies had been available at trial, there would have been a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Musema with respect to the rape of Nyiramusugi. It thus found Alfred Musema not guilty of rape as a crime against humanity but affirmed the verdict of culpability for genocide and extermination as crime against humanity.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-96-13

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).