Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing all 3 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    District Court in Belgrade (War Crimes Chamber) - Anton Lekaj

    Year
    2007
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men Sexual Violence against Children
    Country
    Serbia
    Keywords
    Co-perpetration Common Objective of JCE Aiding and Abetting Sexual Violence against Men/Boys

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1047
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    District Court in Belgrade (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Anton Lekaj
    Charges
    Lekaj was charged on 7 July 2005 with war crimes against civilians, including sexual assaults, including rape recognized by Article 142(1) of the Basic Penal Code in relation to Article 22 of the Basic Penal Code. Lekaj was held responsible as a co-perpetrator. Lekaj, as a member of the ‘Cipat’ group, aided and abetted KLA members in the realization of their joint plan to achieve full KLA control over the territory of Kosovo and Metohija and to expel all non-Albanians from the region. In particular, between 12 and 15 of June 1999, Lekaj, together with other members of the KLA, detained 13 non-Albanian civilians and transferred them to premises in the Pastrik Hotel. The 13 civilians were beaten, tortured, sexually abused, and some of them were even killed. The sexual abuse included a case of rape of a minor (together with another person) and the rape of a man (anal and oral). The crimes were held to have been committed in 1999 in the ?akovica municipality in the Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 18 September 2006, he was found guilty for war crimes against civilians, including rape.
    sentencing
    Lekaj was sentenced to 13 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 6 April 2007, the High Court of Serbia also found Lekaj guilty and upheld the 13 years’ sentence.
    Status
    2715

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Momcilo Krajisnik

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Persecution on Sexual Grounds Sexual Slavery Specific Intent Common Objective of JCE

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/709/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Momcilo Krajisnik
    Charges
    Krajisnik was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included rapes and sexual assault of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs; - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction as genocide and/or complicity in genocide under Article 7(1) (JCE) and 7(3), which included subjecting Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat detainees in various detention facilities to sexual violence.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Krajisnik was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 27 September 2006 of persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE). Krajisnik was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction as genocide and/or complicity in genocide under Article 7(1) (JCE) and 7(3), which included subjecting Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat detainees in various detention facilities to sexual violence. He was found not guilty of genocide since the specific intent for genocide could not be established.
    sentencing
    Krajisnik was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 20 years’ imprisonment on 17 March 2009 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    However, the Appeals Chamber on 17 March 2009 reversed the sexual violence conviction – i.e. persecution as a crime against humanity – as it found that the Trial Chamber committed an error as persecution fell outside the original common objective of the JCE, which only encompassed the crimes of deportation and forcible transfer.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-00-39

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Nebojsa Pavkovic (“Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Persecution on Sexual Grounds Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Superior Responsibility Physical Integrity Consent Foreseeable Consequence Common Objective of JCE Kosovo Albanian Civilians Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Nebojsa Pavkovic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE III) for sexual assaults committed in Decani/Deçan and in Cirez/Qirez in the municipality of Srbica/Skenderaj by the VJ and MUP forces executing his orders. - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Pavkovic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity Pavkovic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity
    sentencing
    Pavkovic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 22 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber, with Judge Liu and Judge Tuzmukhamedov dissenting, subsequently found that the Trial Chamber incorrectly held Pavkovic not guilty for committing through his participation in a JCE III persecution, through sexual assaults, as a crime against humanity in Priština/Prishtina, but declined, Judge Ramaroson dissenting, to enter new convictions against him in this regard (with reference to Article 25(2) of the ICTY Statute and the Jelisic Appeal Judgement, para. 73 (discretion in choice of remedy lies with the Chamber)).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).