Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 11 to 20 of 31 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Gratien Kabiligi (Bagasora et al. "Military I")

    Year
    2008
    Issues
    Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Persecution on Sexual Grounds Tutsi Military

    Reference link
    http://unictr.irmct.org/en/cases/ictr-98-41
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Gratien Kabiligi
    Charges
    Kabiligi had been charged with sexual violence crimes - i.e. conspiracy to commit genocide, genocide, complicity in genocide, rape as a crime against humanity, persecution as a crime against humanity, other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, violence to health and to the physical or mental well-being of civilians as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, rape and indecent assault as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for: (i) rapes, sexual assaults and other crimes of a sexual nature committed against Tutsi women and girls throughout Rwanda, including at the secondary nursing school in Kabgayi, in Gitarama prefecture; and (ii) the sexual assault of Prime Minister Agathe Uwilingiyimana.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kabiligi was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 18 December 2008 on all counts, thus including the sexual violence charges. The Trial Chamber did not find that he was directly involved in any of the specific criminal events alleged. In addition, the evidence did not show that his subordinates committed crimes when Kabiligi exercised effective control over them.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Prosecution did not appeal these sexual violence acquittals.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-41

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Idelphonse Hategekimana

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Genocidal Rape Tutsi Acquittal Command Responsibility Genocidal Intent

    Reference link
    http://www.unictr.org/en/cases/ictr-00-55b
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Idelphonse Hategekimana
    Charges
    - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rape of Nura Sezirahiga by a soldier from Ngoma Military Camp, during an attack led by Hategekimana.- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (JCE) for the sexual violence.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Hategekimana was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 6 December 2010 of: - Rape as a crime against humanity Hategekimana was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide as the Trial Chamber found that the evidence did not establish that Nura Sezirahiga was a Tutsi or that she was raped with genocidal intent.
    sentencing
    Hategekimana was sentenced to life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Hategekimana’s acquittal for genocide was not appealed by the prosecution. The Appeals Chamber on 8 May 2012 confirmed the conviction for sexual violence by the Trial Chamber.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-00-55B

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Ildephonse Nizeyimana

    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Crimes Against Humanity Gang Rape Genocide Tutsi War Crimes

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-00-55c
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Ildephonse Nizeyimana
    Charges
    The charges concerned:Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide, rape as a crime against humanity and rape as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Articles 6(1) and 6(3) for: (i) ordering FAR soldiers, gendarmes and officers stationed at both Ngoma Camp and ESO to rape tutsi women and for the subsequent rapes (ordering); and for (ii) ordering or instigating soldiers from the FAR, ESO, Ngoma Camp, Butare Gendarmerie Camp and Interahamwe militia to rape Tutsi women at Butare Hospital, Butare University and at various locations in Butare prefecture, including the residence of Rosalie Gicanda, and for the subsequent rapes, including the multiple rapes and gang-rapes of MKA, ZBL, BUQ, BJW and DCO (ordering or instigating).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Nizeyimana was charged with sexual violence crimes, the Trial Chamber (on 19 June 2012) held that no factual allegations supporting Nizeyimana’s liability for these crimes had been proven. Therefore, the counts were dismissed.
    sentencing
    Nizeyimana was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment on 29 September 2014 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Prosecution partly appealed these findings on sexual violence. However, the Appeals Chamber found that the Prosecution had failed to show that the Trial Chamber erred in finding that the perpetrators of the rapes at Butare Hospital were not sufficiently identified as ESO soldiers and, therefore, that it could not hold Nizeyimana liable as a superior on this basis. For these reasons, the Appeals Chamber needed not to consider the Prosecution’s arguments on whether Nizeyimana failed to prevent or punish his subordinates for the rapes committed at Butare Hospital. Based on the foregoing, the Appeals Chamber dismissed the Prosecution’s ground of Appeal.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-00-55C

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Innocent Sagahutu (Ndindiliyimana et al. “Military II”)

    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Humiliating and Degrading Treatment War Crimes Rape as Crime Against Humanity

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-00-56
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Innocent Sagahutu
    Charges
    Rape as a crime against humanity and rape, humiliating and degrading treatment as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for failing to prevent or to punish the rapes committed by soldiers from the A squad of the Reconnaissance battalion, led by Sagahutu and under the command of Major Nzuwonemeye in the kiosks at the entrance of the hospital of Kigali during April, May and June 1994.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Sagahutu was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 17 May 2011)for the sexual violence charges.
    sentencing
    Sagahutu was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment on 11 February 2014 by the Appeals Chamber (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Prosecution did not appeal the acquittals for sexual violence.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-00-56

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Jean de Dieu Kamuhanda

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Inhuman Treatment Genocidal Rape

    Reference link
    http://www.unictr.org/en/cases/ictr-99-54a
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Jean de Dieu Kamuhanda
    Charges
    Rape as a crime against humanity, other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity, outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, rape and indecent assault as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes and violence to health and to the physical or mental well-being of civilians as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) and 6(3) (command responsibility), for the rapes of Tutsi women committed during various attacks, including on the school in Kikomero, in Kigali-rural prefecture, on or about 12 April 1994.
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Trial Chamber on 22 January 2004 found Kamuhanda not guilty of all sexual violence charges. The Trial Chamber held that there was insufficient evidence of the alleged sexual violence.
    sentencing
    Kamuhanda was sentenced to life imprisonment on 19 September 2005.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Prosecution did not appeal Kamuhanda’s acquittals for the sexual violence crimes.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-99-54A

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Justin Mugenzi (Bizimungu et al. “Government II”)

    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Insufficient Evidence Outrages upon Personal Dignity

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-99-50
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Justin Mugenzi
    Charges
    Mugenzi was charged in the indictment with:Rape as a crime against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Articles 6(1) and 6(3).However, the charges were not substantiated with material facts related to the sexual violence.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Mid-trial, in 2005, Mugenzi was acquitted of the sexual violence charges due to a lack of evidence (See the Decision on Defense Motions Pursuant to Rule 98bis). Mugenzi was acquitted by the Trial Chamber (on 30 September 2011) on the sexual violence counts, but not for conspiracy to commit genocide and direct and public incitement to commit genocide (for other – non sexual violence – crimes).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Mugenzi was acquitted by the Appeals Chamber on 4 February 2014 (on all counts).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-99-50

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Juvenal Kajelijeli

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Other Inhumane Acts Command Responsibility

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-98-44a
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Juvenal Kajelijeli
    Charges
    The sexual violence charges were charged as:- Conspiracy to commit genocide for causing serious bodily or mental harm under Articles 6(1) (direct responsibility) and 6(3) (command responsibility).- Rape as a crime against humanity; - Persecution as a crime against humanity; - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kajelijeli was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 1 December 2003) of: - Conspiracy to commit genocide for causing serious bodily or mental harm - Rape as a crime against humanity; according to the Trial Chamber, the Prosecution had failed to prove Kajelijeli’s responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt under either Article 6(1) or 6(3), with Judge Ramaroson dissenting.- Persecution as a crime against humanity; this count was withdrawn by the Chamber on the request of the Prosecution during the closing arguments. The Prosecution chose to withdraw the charge due to insufficient evidence.- Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity; according to the Trial Chamber, the Prosecution had failed to prove Kajelijeli’s responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt under either Article 6(1) or 6(3), with Judge Ramaroson dissenting.
    sentencing
    Kajelijeli received a sentence of 45 years’ imprisonment on 23 May 2005.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Kajelijeli’s acquittal for the sexual violence crimes was not appealed by the Prosecution.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-44A

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Laurent Semanza

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Instigating Command Responsibility Insufficient Evidence Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-97-20
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Laurent Semanza
    Charges
    - Rape and torture as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for the rape of Victim A (instigating)- Complicity in genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) -Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (instigating, ordering and encouraging) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) -Persecution as a crime against humanity under Articles 6(1) (direct responsibility) and 6(3) (command responsibility), violence to life, health and physical or mental well-being of persons, in particular cruel treatment such as rape as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime, and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, rape, sexual abuse and other forms of indecent assault as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime the latter two both under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (instigating, ordering and encouraging) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility)
    Trial chamber verdict
    Semanza was found guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 15 May 2003) of:- Rape and torture as a crime against humanitySemanza was found not guilty of:- Complicity in genocide as far as it concerned the sexual violence. According to the Trial Chamber the Prosecution had not adduced any evidence of rapes or other forms of sexual violence at Musha church, Mwulire hill and Mabare mosque - Rape as a crime against humanity as the charge was based on two paragraphs of the indictment that the Trial Chamber considered too vague, thereby prejudicing Semanza’s ability to prepare his defense- Persecution as a crime against humanity because the Trial Chamber found that the Prosecution did not introduce any evidence of rapes or other forms of sexual violence at Musha church, Mwulire hill and Mabare mosque
    sentencing
    Semanza received a sentence of 35 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber (on 20 May 2005) upheld the Trial Chamber’s sexual violence convictions against Semanza. In addition, the Appeals Chamber entered a conviction for violence to life, health and physical or mental well-being of persons as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime for the rape of Victim A (instigating). The Appeals Chamber held, with Judge Pocar dissenting, that the Trial Chamber had committed an error of law when it failed to enter a conviction for this count.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-97-20

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Prosper Mugiraneza (Bizimungu et al. “Government II”)

    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Genocide Insufficient Evidence Outrages upon Personal Dignity

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-99-50
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Prosper Mugiraneza
    Charges
    Mugiraneza was charged in the indictment with:- Rape as a crime against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Articles 6(1) and 6(3).
    Trial chamber verdict
    The charges were not substantiated with material facts related to the sexual violence.Mid-trial, in 2005, Mugiraneza was acquitted of the sexual violence charges due to a lack of evidence (See the Decision on Defense Motions Pursuant to Rule 98bis). Mugiraneza was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on the sexual violence counts, but not for conspiracy to commit genocide and direct and public incitement to commit genocide (for other – non sexual violence – crimes).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Mugiraneza was acquitted by the Appeals Chamber on 4 February 2014 (on all counts).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-99-50

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Simon Bikindi

    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Complicity Genocidal Rape Insufficient Evidence Tutsi

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-01-72
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Simon Bikindi
    Charges
    Bikindi was charged with sexual violence crimes - i.e. causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) or, in the alternative, complicity in genocide under Article 6(1) (ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting) for, inter alia, rapes and acts of sexual violence committed by Interahamwe under his effective control against Tutsi women (including the rape of a woman named Ancilla), in the course of the execution of his orders to kill all Tutsi in Rubavu area.
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Trial Chamber (on 2 December 2008) held that Bikindi was not guilty thereof as the Prosecution had not proven these charges beyond reasonable doubt.
    sentencing
    Bikindi received a sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment on 18 March 2010 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber dismissed all of Bikindi's grounds of appeal.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-01-72

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).