Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 21 to 30 of 34 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dusko Sikirica (Sikirica et al. "Keraterm Camp")

    Year
    2001
    Issues
    Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Camp Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Aiding and Abetting Instigating Command Responsibility

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/775/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dusko Sikirica
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(3) (command responsibility) for sexual assault of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained at the Keraterm camp.- Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as war crimes under Articles 7(1) (instigating, committing or aiding and abetting) and 7(3) (command responsibility) for sexual assault of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained at the Keraterm camp.- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and complicity in genocide under Articles 7(1) and 7(3) for subjecting Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat detainees at Keraterm camp to rapes and sexual assault.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Sikirica entered a guilty plea on 19 September 2001 and was found guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity As Sikirica entered a guilty plea to persecution as a crime against humanity only, the other sexual violence charges were withdrawn. Sikirica was therefore found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as war crimes - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and complicity in genocide
    sentencing
    Sikirica was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment by the Trial Chamber on 13 November 2001.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-8

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dusko Tadic (“Prijedor”)

    Year
    2000
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Forced Oral Sex Mutilation Insufficient Evidence Gang Rape Aiding and Abetting Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/787/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dusko Tadic
    Charges
    - Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) (individual responsibility) (aiding and abetting) for forcing two prisoners to commit oral sexual acts and for forcing one prisoner to sexually mutilate another prisoner.- Persecution as a crime against humanity as far as the sexual violence crimes were concerned.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Tadic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 7 May 1997 of:- Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as crimes against humanity Tadic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of:- Persecution as a crime against humanity as far as the sexual violence crimes were concerned. According to the Trial Chamber there was insufficient evidence regarding Tadic’s participation in sexual assault and torture inflicted through gang-rapes.
    sentencing
    Tadic was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment on 26 January 2000.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber found Tadic on 15 July 1999 additionally guilty of: - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime under Article 7(1) (individual responsibility) (aiding and abetting) for forcing two prisoners to commit oral sexual acts and for forcing one prisoner to sexually mutilate another prisoner as it was not established that the victims were protected persons. Thus, for the same acts as he was found guilty by the Trial Chamber.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-94-1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Goran Hadzic

    Issues
    Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Detention Centers Ill-health Ordering/Instigating Psychological Impact

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/694/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Goran Hadzic
    Charges
    Hadzic is charged with sexual violence crimes in the indictment (of 22 July 2001) and includes persecution as a crime against humanity, torture as a crime against humanity, inhumane acts as crimes against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Articles 7(1) (committing in concert with others, planning, instigating, ordering, and/or aiding and abetting) and 7(3) (command responsibility) for imposing on Croat and other non-Serb civilian detainees living conditions in various detention facilities in the SAO SBWS characterized by, inter alia, inhumane treatment and constant physical and psychological assault, including sexual assault.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-75

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Idriz Balaj ("Haradinaj et al.")

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions Sexual Violence against Men
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Ordering/Instigating Kunarac Unreliable Testimony Retrial

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Idriz Balaj
    Charges
    Balaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing or planning), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02 and Witness 61.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Balaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was acquitted on all charges against him by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, which thus includes the sexual violence charges stipulated above.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to acquit Balaj on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Balaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. Balaj was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 after retrial.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-84

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Lahi Brahimaj ("Haradinaj et al.")

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Kunarac Ordering/Instigating Retrial Unreliable Testimony

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Lahi Brahimaj
    Charges
    Brahimaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02 and Witness 61.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Brahimaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was found, by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, not guilty of the charges of sexual violence against him.
    sentencing
    Brahimaj was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to hold Brahimaj not guilty on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Brahimaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. He was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 for the charges in the re-trial indictment and thus for the remaining sexual violence charge.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-84

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Miroslav Bralo (“Lasva Valley”)

    Year
    2007
    Issues
    Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Biting Ejaculating HVO Soldiers Aiding and Abetting

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/671/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Miroslav Bralo
    Charges
    - Torture or inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime, outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and unlawful confinement as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime under Article 7(1) (committing and aiding and abetting) for repeatedly raping Witness A and biting her nipples while Furundžija interrogated her in the presence of others on, or about, 15 May 1993 and for confining her in a house in the area of Nadioci where she was repeatedly raped by members of the “Jokers” with the knowledge of Bralo between 16 May 1993 and July 1993.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Bralo entered a guilty plea to all counts in the indictment on 19 July 2005. Bralo was found guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Torture or inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime, outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and unlawful confinement as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime.
    sentencing
    Bralo was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment on 2 April 2007.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-17

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Nikola Sainovic ("Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.")

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Definition of Sexual Assault Kunarac Knowledge of the Crimes

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Nikola Sainovic
    Charges
    Sainovic was charged with: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through, inter alia, sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians; and - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1), which included sexual assaults by forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia of the Kosovo Albanian population.
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Trial Chamber, with Judge Ali Nawaz Chowhan partly dissenting, held that it was not established that the sexual assault charges that were proven (in Beleg and Cirez/Qirez) were reasonably foreseeable to Sainovic and that he lacked knowledge of these crimes.
    sentencing
    Sainovic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 18 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 23 January 2014, with Judge Liu and Judge Tuzmukhamedov dissenting, subsequently found that the Trial Chamber incorrectly held Sainovic not guilty for committing through his participation in a JCE persecution, through sexual assaults, as a crime against humanity in Beleg, Cirez/Qirez, and Pristina/Prishtina, but declined, Judge Ramaroson dissenting, to enter new convictions against him in this regard (with reference to Article 25(2) of the ICTY Statute and the Jelisic Appeal Judgement, para. 73 (discretion in choice of remedy lies with the Chamber)).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Radomir Kovac (Kunarac et al. "Foca")

    Year
    2002
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Penetration Consent Sexual Slavery Aiding and Abetting

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/712/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Radomir Kovac
    Charges
    - Enslavement as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (committing and aiding and abetting) for: (i) detaining FWS-75 and the 12-year-old girl A.B. in his apartment for about a week and FWS-87 and A.S. for about four months and for treating them as his property; (ii) raping FWS-75, FWS-87 and A.B. and for aiding and abetting the rapes of these women and of A.S. by allowing other soldiers to visit or stay in his apartment and to rape them or by encouraging the soldiers to do so, and by handing the girls over to other men with the knowledge that they would rape them: (iii) forcing FWS-87, A.S. and A.B. to strip and dance naked on a table while watching them; and (iv) selling A.B. for 200 Deutschmarks, FWS-87 and A.S. for 500 Deutschmarks each and for handing over FWS-75 to other men.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kovac was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 22 February 2001 of: - Enslavement as a crime against humanity - Rape as a crime against humanity - Rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Kovac was given a sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment on 12 June 2002.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions were upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 12 June 2002.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-96-23 and IT-96-23/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Ramush Haradinaj ("Haradinaj et al.")

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Kunarac Unreliable Testimony Retrial

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Ramush Haradinaj
    Charges
    Haradinaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Haradinaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was acquitted on all charges against him by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, thus all of the sexual violence charges stipulated above.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to acquit Haradinaj on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Haradinaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. Haradinaj was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 after retrial.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-84

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Vladimir Lazarevic ("Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.")

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Definition of Sexual Assault Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Knowledge of the Crimes Kunarac Specific Intent

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Vladimir Lazarevic
    Charges
    Lazarevic was charged with: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through, inter alia, sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians; and - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3), which included sexual assaults by forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia of the Kosovo Albanian population.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Lazarevic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of both the above stipulated charges. With regard to deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity, the Trial Chamber found that, while the forcible displacements were part of the VJ and MUP organized campaign, it was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that sexual assaults were intended aims of this campaign. The Trial Chamber found that it was not proved that Lazarevic was aware that the VJ and MUP were going into some specific crime sites in order to commit sexual assaults and, therefore, the Trial Chamber found that the mental element of aiding and abetting was not established in relation to these crimes. Moreover, it did not find that information regarding the specific sexual assaults, for which it was provided that the VJ was responsible, was available to Lazarevic or that he had reason to know about them.
    sentencing
    Lazarevic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 14 years’ imprisonment on 23 January 2014 (for other charges).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).