Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 11 to 20 of 34 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Jean-Paul Akayesu

    Year
    2001
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Forced Nudity Aiding and Abetting Ordering/Instigating Sexual Violence as Genocide Rape as Crime Against Humanity Akayesu

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-96-4
    Full reference
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu, Judgment, 1 June 2001, ICTR-96-4.
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Jean-Paul Akayesu
    Charges
    - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for: i) the rape of Witness JJ by an Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (ii) multiple acts of rape of fifteen girls and women by numerous Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (iii) multiple acts of rape of ten girls and women by numerous Interahamwe (ordering, instigating and aiding and abetting); (iv) the rape of Witness OO by an Interahamwe named Antoine (ordering, instigating and aiding and abetting); (v) the rape of a woman by Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (vi) the rape of the younger sister of Witness NN by an Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (vii) the multiple rapes of Alexia, wife of Ntereye, and her two nieces Louise and Nishimwe by Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for: (i) the forced undressing of the wife of Tharcisse (aiding and abetting); (ii) the forced undressing and naked public marching of Chantal (ordering, instigating and aiding and abetting); and (iii) the forced undressing of Alexia, wife of Ntereye, and her two nieces Louise and Nishimwe and to have them perform exercises naked in public (aiding and abetting). - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for all of the above mentioned sexual violence acts (aiding and abetting). - Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular rape, degrading and humiliating treatment and indecent assault, as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime
    Trial chamber verdict
    Akayesu was found guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 2 September 1998) for a number of sexual violence crimes that took place in and around the Taba bureau communal: - Rape as a crime against humanity - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide Akayesu was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular rape, degrading and humiliating treatment and indecent assault, as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime as the Trial Chamber found that it was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the acts perpetrated by Akayesu were committed in conjunction with the armed conflict.
    sentencing
    Akayesu received a single sentence of life imprisonment (for genocide he had received a sentence of life imprisonment; for rape as a crime against humanity 15 years’ imprisonment; and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity 10 years’ imprisonment).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The sexual violence convictions by the Trial Chamber were upheld by the Appeals Chamber (on 1 June 2001).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-96-4

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Mikaeli Muhimana

    Year
    2007
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Physical Invasion Rape as Crime Against Humanity

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-95-1b
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Mikaeli Muhimana
    Charges
    - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for raping Tutsi women and one Hutu woman he believed to be a Tutsi. - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (committing) for the rapes of 5 women and girls (4 Tutsi women and 1 Hutu woman whom he mistakenly believed was a Tutsi); and (aiding and abetting) the rapes of 5 Tutsi women and girls.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Muhimana was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 28 April 2005 of:- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide - Rape as a crime against humanity
    sentencing
    Muhimana received a sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 21 May 2007 reversed, with Judges Shahabuddeen and Schomburg dissenting, Muhimana’s conviction for rape as a crime against humanity in so far it concerned the rapes of two women, Mukashyaka and Kamukina (already taken out above). The other rapes as crimes against humanity were affirmed by the Appeals Chamber.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-95-1B

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR transfer - Ladislas Ntaganzwa

    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Amended Indictment Aiding and Abetting Interahamwe Ordering/Instigating Hostage

    Reference link
    http://www.unmict.org/en/cases/mict-12-21
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of accused
    Ladislas Ntaganzwa
    Charges
    Ntaganzwa is charged with sexual violence crimes (in the second amended indictment of 30 March 2012) as follows: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (committing, ordering and instigating, and aiding and abetting) and 6(3) (command responsibility). - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (committing, ordering and instigating, and aiding and abetting) and 6(3) (command responsibility). The underlying facts that relate to the sexual violence for all these charges concern: (i) at a date in early May 1994, at the Ryabidandi roadblock, Ryabidandi cellule, Nyagisozi secteur, Nyakizu commune, Ntaganzwa instructed and prompted a group of about eight JDR, interahamwe, and Hutu and Twa civilians to rape a Tutsi woman named Astorie (last name unknown). Acting on the direct instructions and the prompting of Ntaganzwa, Astorie was repeatedly raped during the night at a residence close to the Judicial Police Inspector’s residence within Ryabidandi cellule; (ii) On or about the day after this event, Ntaganzwa instructed and prompted a certain Habib, a Hutu civilian, to rape ARH, a Tutsi woman. Following Ntaganzwa’s instructions and prompting, Habib took ARH hostage and repeatedly raped her for a period of approximately 2 months.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    MICT-12-21

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR transfer - Ryandikayo

    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Accused at large Aiding and Abetting Ordering/Instigating Interahamwe

    Reference link
    http://unictr.irmct.org/en/cases/ictr-95-1e
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of accused
    Ryandikayo
    Charges
    Ryandikayo is charged with sexual violence crimes (in the second amended indictment of 8 May 2012) as follows: - Genocide for harming, including by raping, under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). [NB. Only 2(3)(a) is charged, not 2(3)(b), even though rape is mentioned for the count of genocide] - Complicity in genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). The underlying facts that relate to the sexual violence for all these charges concern: (i) Ryandikayo took Jacqueline Uwineza into his house in Mubuga where he raped her and then took her to his banana plantation where she was killed by Interahamwe who beat her with clubs and machetes on his instigation and prompting (paragraph 24); (ii) the leading of six Tutsi girls on foot to the Mubuga cemetery and raping them, on the instructions of, inter alia, Ryandikayo (paragraph 33); (iii) in the course of an attack at Mubuga Catholic church, Ryandikayo together with Interahamwe and armed Hutu civilians, who acted in accordance with Ryandikayo’s instructions, prompting, and plan, raped and killed other Tutsi girls who were in the parish. Among them was a girl by the name of Claudine who resided near the parish.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    MICT-12-22

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR transfer - Wenceslas Munyeshyaka

    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Rwanda, France
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Interahamwe In Absentia Priest

    Reference link
    Link 1 Link 2
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of accused
    Wenceslas Munyeshyaka
    Charges
    In the indictment of 2005, he was charged with: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for (i) (aiding and abetting) an Interahamwe to rape HH a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish; (ii) (aiding and abetting) an Interahamwe to rape BFY a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish; (iii) (committing) rape on GG a Tutsi civilian girl, in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish in Kigali city; (iv) (committing) rape on BB a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish in Kigali city; (v) (committing) rape on EE, a Tutsi civilian girl, in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish, Kigali city. - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for: (i) (committing) rape on GG a Tutsi civilian girl, in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish in Kigali city; (ii) (aiding and abetting) an Interahamwe to rape a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Sainte-Famille Parish, in Kigali city; (iii) (aiding and abetting) an Interahamwe to rape a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Sainte-Famille parish, in Kigali city; (iv) (committing) rape on a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Sainte-Famille Parish in Kigali city; (v) (committing) rape on EE, a Tutsi civilian girl, in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish, Kigali city; (vi) (committing) rape on FF a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish in Kigali city. In addition, planning and joint criminal enterprise III are also mentioned in the indictment, in more general terms.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    MICT-13-45

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Anto Furundžija (“Lašva Valley”)

    Year
    2000
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Akayesu Penetration Coercion Forced Nudity Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Aiding and Abetting Co-perpetration

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/684/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Anto Furundžija
    Charges
    - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (co-perpetration) - Outrages upon personal dignity (including rape) as a violation of the laws or customs of war under Article 7(1) (aiding and abetting) for interrogating Witness A, who was naked, while Accused B rubbed his knife on Witness A’s inner thighs and threatened to cut out her private parts if she did not tell the truth in answer to the interrogation by Furundžija. Accused B then repeatedly raped Witness A in front of an audience of soldiers.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Furundžija was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 10 December 1998 of: - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Outrages upon personal dignity (including rape) as a violation of the laws or customs of war. Although Furundžija did not rape Witness A himself, the Trial Chamber found that his presence and continued interrogation of Witness A aided and abetted the crimes committed by Accused B.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 21 July 2000 affirmed the convictions made by the Trial Chamber.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-17/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragan Nikolic (“Susica Camp”)

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Camp Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Detention Centers Terrorism Aiding and Abetting

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/754/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragan Nikolic
    Charges
    Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (committing) for the persecution of Muslim and non-Serb detainees at the Sušica camp by participating in sexual violence directed at women at the Sušica camp and by subjecting detainees to an atmosphere of terror, which included sexual violence.- Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (aiding and abetting) for facilitating the removal of female detainees from the hangar, which he knew was for purposes of rapes committed by camp guards, special forces, local soldiers and other men and by encouraging these rapes.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Nikolic entered a guilty plea to all charges in the indictment on 4 September 2003. Nikolic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity - Rape as a crime against humanity
    sentencing
    Nikolic was sentenced by the Trial Chamber to 20 years’ imprisonment on 4 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-94-2

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragan Zelenovic (“Foca”)

    Year
    2007
    Issues
    Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Sexual Assault/Attack/Abuse Humiliating and Degrading Treatment Aiding and Abetting Co-perpetration

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/794/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragan Zelenovic
    Charges
    - Torture as a crime against humanity and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) for the rape of witness FWS-75 (aiding and abetting) and for raping Witness FWS-87 (committing). - Torture as a crime against humanity and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) for the rapes of witness FWS-87 and two unidentified women (co-perpetration) and for raping Witnesses FWS-75 and FWS-87 three times (committing). - Torture as a crime against humanity and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) for the rape of witness FWS-87 (committing).-Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) for the rapes of witness FWS-75 and two unidentified women (co-perpetration) and for raping Witness FWS-87 (committing).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Zelenovic entered a guilty plea to several counts in the indictment on 17 January 2007, which included several charges related to sexual violence. Zelenovic was therefore found guilty of: - (a) Torture as a crime against humanity and rape as a crime against humanity. - (b) Torture as a crime against humanity and rape as a crime against humanity. - (c) Torture as a crime against humanity and rape as a crime against humanity . - (d) Rape as a crime against humanity. Zelenovic was therefore found not guilty of: - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for, inter alia, the crimes mentioned under (a) above. - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for, inter alia, the crimes mentioned under (b) above. - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for, inter alia, the crimes mentioned under (c) above. - Rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for, inter alia, the crimes mentioned under (d) above.
    sentencing
    Zelenovic was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment on 31 October 2007.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-96-23/2

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragoljub Kunarac (Kunarac et al. "Foca")

    Year
    2002
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Penetration Sexual Slavery Lack of Consent Aiding and Abetting Vagina Rape as Crime Against Humanity Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/712/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragoljub Kunarac
    Charges
    - Torture as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (committing and aiding and abetting) for: (i) taking FWS-75 and D.B. to his headquarters at Ulica Osmana Ðikica no. 16, where he raped D.B. and aided and abetted the gang-rape of FWS-75 by several soldiers; (ii) taking FWS-87, FWS-75, FWS-50 and D.B. to his headquarters at Ulica Osmana Ðikica no. 16, where he raped FWS-87 and aided and abetted the torture and rapes of FWS-87, FWS-75 and FWS-50 by soldiers; (iii) transferring FWS-95 from Partizan Sports Hall to his headquarters at Ulica Osmana Ðikica no. 16, where he raped her; (iv) taking FWS-87 to a room on the upper floor of Karaman’s house in Miljevina, where he raped her; (v) threatening to kill FWS-183 and her son while he tried to obtain information or a confession from FWS-183 concerning her alleged sending of messages to the Muslim forces and information about the whereabouts of her valuables and for raping her on that occasion; and (vi) raping FWS-191 and aiding and abetting the rape of FWS-186 by soldiers in an abandoned house in Trnovace.- Enslavement as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (committing and aiding and abetting) for the enslavement of FWS-186 and FWS-191 for a period of six months in a house in Trnovace and for treating them as his property.- Torture as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for taking FWS-48 and two other women to the Hotel Zelengora where he raped FWS-48 and for taking FWS-48 and FWS-95 to a house in the Donje Polje neighborhood where he raped FWS-48.- Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for taking FWS-186, FWS-191 and J.G. from the house Ulica Osmana Ðikica no. 16 to the abandoned house of Halid Cedic in Trnovace, where they were raped, and for raping FWS-191 approximately 6 months and treating FWS-186 and FWS-191 as his personal property.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kunarac was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 22 February 2001 of: - Torture as a crime against humanity - Rape as a crime against humanity - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Enslavement as a crime against humanity Kunarac was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Torture as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for taking FWS-48 and two other women to the Hotel Zelengora where he raped FWS-48 and for taking FWS-48 and FWS-95 to a house in the Donje Polje neighborhood where he raped FWS-48. - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Kunarac received a sentence of 28 years’ imprisonment on 12 June 2002.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions by the Trial Chamber were upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 12 June 2002.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-96-23 and IT-96-23/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragoljub Ojdanic ("Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.")

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Definition of Sexual Assault Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Kunarac Knowledge of the Crimes

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragoljub Ojdanic ("Sainovic et al."; previously Milotinovic et al.)
    Charges
    Ojdanic was charged with: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through, inter alia, sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians; and - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3), which included sexual assaults by forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia of the Kosovo Albanian population.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ojdanic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity; - Persecution as a crime against humanity. With regard to deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity, the Trial Chamber found that, while the forcible displacements were part of the VJ and MUP organized campaign, it was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that sexual assaults were intended aims of this campaign. The Trial Chamber found that it was not proved that Ojdanic was aware that the VJ and MUP were going into some specific crime sites in order to commit sexual assaults and, therefore, the Trial Chamber found that the mental element of aiding and abetting was not established in relation to these crimes. Moreover, it did not find that information regarding the specific sexual assaults, for which it was provided that the VJ was responsible, was available to Ojdanic or that he had reason to know about them.
    sentencing
    Ojdanic was sentenced by the Trial Chamber to 15 years’ imprisonment on 26 February 2009 (for other charges). His sentence was not appealed.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).