Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 21 to 30 of 34 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Miroslav Bralo (“Lasva Valley”)

    Year
    2007
    Issues
    Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Biting Ejaculating HVO Soldiers Aiding and Abetting

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/671/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Miroslav Bralo
    Charges
    - Torture or inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime, outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and unlawful confinement as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime under Article 7(1) (committing and aiding and abetting) for repeatedly raping Witness A and biting her nipples while Furundžija interrogated her in the presence of others on, or about, 15 May 1993 and for confining her in a house in the area of Nadioci where she was repeatedly raped by members of the “Jokers” with the knowledge of Bralo between 16 May 1993 and July 1993.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Bralo entered a guilty plea to all counts in the indictment on 19 July 2005. Bralo was found guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Torture or inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime, outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and unlawful confinement as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime.
    sentencing
    Bralo was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment on 2 April 2007.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-17

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragoljub Ojdanic ("Sainovic et al.; previously Milutinovic et al.")

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Definition of Sexual Assault Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Kunarac Knowledge of the Crimes

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/740/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragoljub Ojdanic ("Sainovic et al."; previously Milotinovic et al.)
    Charges
    Ojdanic was charged with: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) for deliberately creating an atmosphere of fear and oppression through, inter alia, sexual assault of Kosovo Albanian women, in order to forcibly displace and deport Kosovo Albanian civilians; and - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) and 7(3), which included sexual assaults by forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia of the Kosovo Albanian population.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ojdanic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2009 of: - Deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity; - Persecution as a crime against humanity. With regard to deportation as a crime against humanity and other inhumane acts (forcible transfer) as crimes against humanity, the Trial Chamber found that, while the forcible displacements were part of the VJ and MUP organized campaign, it was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that sexual assaults were intended aims of this campaign. The Trial Chamber found that it was not proved that Ojdanic was aware that the VJ and MUP were going into some specific crime sites in order to commit sexual assaults and, therefore, the Trial Chamber found that the mental element of aiding and abetting was not established in relation to these crimes. Moreover, it did not find that information regarding the specific sexual assaults, for which it was provided that the VJ was responsible, was available to Ojdanic or that he had reason to know about them.
    sentencing
    Ojdanic was sentenced by the Trial Chamber to 15 years’ imprisonment on 26 February 2009 (for other charges). His sentence was not appealed.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-05-87

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Damir Brekalo

    Year
    2011
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Children Modes of Liability
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Sentencing Rape, Physical and Mental Harm Rape HVO Soldiers Accomplice Aiding and Abetting Bosnian Muslim Population

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1199
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Damir Brekalo
    Charges
    Brekalo was charged on 1 December 2006 (indictment confirmed) with crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (Article 172(1)(g) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina), in conjunction with Articles 29 and 180(1) of the Criminal Code of BiH, for attacking the Bosnian Muslim civilian population of Mostar Municipality, in the period from July 1993 to March 1994. During the attack, inter alia, more than 70 Bosniak women, children and elderly were unlawfully arrested and detained in inhumane conditions in houses and other facilities in the village of Vojno, where they were exposed to physical and mental abuse, torture, rape and sexual violence.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 20 February 2009, the Court pronounced the first-instance verdict finding the Brekalo guilty of crimes against humanity, including rape. Brekalo was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment.
    sentencing
    Brekalo was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Panel of the Appellate Division of the Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina, having held the Appellate Panel session, handed down the decision on revoking the first-instance verdict of 20 February 2009 and ordering a hearing to be held before the Appellate Panel. The trial before the Appellate Panel was initiated on 6 July 2010.On 9 March 2011, the Appellate Panel of the Court of BiH pronounced the second-instance verdict finding the Brekalo guilty of crimes against humanity, including rape and other forms of sexual violence, under Article 29 (accomplice) and Article 180(1) (individual criminal responsibility - planning, instigating, ordering, perpetrating or otherwise aiding and abetting) of the Criminal Code of BiH.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    KT-RZ 200/06 (Court Number X-KRN-06/300)

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Marko Radic

    Year
    2011
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Children
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Child Sex Abuse/Molestation HVO Soldiers Insufficient Evidence Psychological Impact Rape Bosnian Muslim Population Accomplice Aiding and Abetting

    Reference link
    https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/marko-radic/
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Marko Radic
    Charges
    Radic was charged on 1 December 2006 (indictment confirmed) with crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (Article 172(1)(g) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina), in conjunction with Articles 29 and 180(1), (2) and (3) of the Criminal Code of BiH (individual and command responsibility), for attacking the Bosnian Muslim civilian population of Mostar Municipality, in the period from July 1993 to March 1994. During the attack, inter alia, more than 70 Bosniak women, children and elderly were unlawfully arrested and detained in inhumane conditions in houses and other facilities in the village of Vojno, where they were exposed to physical and mental abuse, torture, rape and sexual violence.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 20 February 2009, the Court pronounced the first-instance verdict finding the Radic guilty of crimes against humanity, including rape.
    sentencing
    Radic was sentenced to 21 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Panel of the Appellate Division of the Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina, having held the Appellate Panel session, handed down the decision on revoking the first-instance verdict of 20 February 2009 and ordering a hearing to be held before the Appellate Panel. The trial before the Appellate Panel was initiated on 6 July 2010. On 9 March 2011, the Appellate Panel of the Court of BiH pronounced the second-instance verdict finding the Radic guilty of crimes against humanity, including rape and other forms of sexual violence, under Article 29 (accomplice) and Article 180(1) (individual criminal responsibility - planning, instigating, ordering, perpetrating or otherwise aiding and abetting) of the Criminal Code of BiH. In absence of sufficient evidence, under this verdict, Radic was acquitted of charges that he personally raped Witness AG.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRŽ-05/139

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Mirko Vracevic

    Year
    2011
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Children
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Sexual Violence, Torture Sentencing Rape, Torture HVO Soldiers Accomplice Aiding and Abetting

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1199
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Mirko Vracevic
    Charges
    Vracevic was charged on 1 December 2006 (indictment confirmed) with crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (Article 172(1)(g) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina), in conjunction with Articles 29 and 180(1) of the Criminal Code of BiH, for attacking the Bosnian Muslim civilian population of Mostar Municipality, in the period from July 1993 to March 1994. During the attack, inter alia, more than 70 Bosniak women, children and elderly were unlawfully arrested and detained in inhumane conditions in houses and other facilities in the village of Vojno, where they were exposed to physical and mental abuse, torture, rape and sexual violence.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 20 February 2009, the Court pronounced the first-instance verdict finding the Vracevic guilty of crimes against humanity, including rape. Vracevic was sentenced to 14 years’ imprisonment.
    sentencing
    Vracevic was sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Panel of the Appellate Division of the Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina, having held the Appellate Panel session, handed down the decision on revoking the first-instance verdict of 20 February 2009 and ordering a hearing to be held before the Appellate Panel. The trial before the Appellate Panel was initiated on 6 July 2010. On 9 March 2011, the Appellate Panel of the Court of BiH pronounced the second-instance verdict finding the Vracevic guilty of crimes against humanity, including rape and other forms of sexual violence, under Article 29 (accomplice) and Article 180(1) (individual criminal responsibility - planning, instigating, ordering, perpetrating or otherwise aiding and abetting) of the Criminal Code of BiH.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    KT-RZ 200/06 (Court Number X-KRN-06/300)

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Idriz Balaj ("Haradinaj et al.")

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions Sexual Violence against Men
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Ordering/Instigating Kunarac Unreliable Testimony Retrial

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Idriz Balaj
    Charges
    Balaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing or planning), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02 and Witness 61.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Balaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was acquitted on all charges against him by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, which thus includes the sexual violence charges stipulated above.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to acquit Balaj on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Balaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. Balaj was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 after retrial.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-84

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Lahi Brahimaj ("Haradinaj et al.")

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Kunarac Ordering/Instigating Retrial Unreliable Testimony

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Lahi Brahimaj
    Charges
    Brahimaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02 and Witness 61.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Brahimaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was found, by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, not guilty of the charges of sexual violence against him.
    sentencing
    Brahimaj was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to hold Brahimaj not guilty on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, committing, planning or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Brahimaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. He was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 for the charges in the re-trial indictment and thus for the remaining sexual violence charge.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-84

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Ramush Haradinaj ("Haradinaj et al.")

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Forced Nudity Genitalia Kunarac Unreliable Testimony Retrial

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/698/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Ramush Haradinaj
    Charges
    Haradinaj was charged with: - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment, torture and outrages upon personal dignity as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting), which included the stripping of Witness SST7/38 naked and the sexual assault of Witness SST7/38’s sister. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground. - Persecution as a crime against humanity or, in the alternative, torture, rape and other inhumane acts (serious physical and mental injury) as crimes against humanity, rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE), which included the repeated rape of Witness SST7/02.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Although Haradinaj was charged with sexual violence crimes, he was acquitted on all charges against him by the Trial Chamber on 3 April 2008, thus all of the sexual violence charges stipulated above.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 19 July 2010 quashed the Trial Chamber’s decision to acquit Haradinaj on several charges, including the charge of cruel treatment and torture as violations of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE or, in the alternative, ordering, instigating or aiding and abetting), which included kicking Naser Lika in the testicles while he lay on the ground, and ordered that Haradinaj be retried on this charge. The Appeals Chamber confirmed the acquittals for the other sexual violence charges. Haradinaj was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2012 after retrial.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-84

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ECCC - Ieng Sary (“Nuon Chea et al.”)

    Year
    2013
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Cambodia
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Coercion Common Purpose Consent Forced Marriage Death of Accused Ordering/Instigating Severance of Charges

    Reference link
    https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/indicted-personpage/ieng-sary
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
    Name of accused
    Ieng Sary
    Charges
    Ieng Sary was charged, in the closing order (indictment) of 15 September 2010, with: - Rape as a crime against humanity, which included forced marriage. - Other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, which included forced marriage. Both for committing (via a joint criminal enterprise), planning, instigating, ordering, or aiding and abetting, or by virtue of superior responsibility punishable under Article 29(new) of the ECCC Law.
    Trial chamber verdict
    However, the accused appealed the closing order stating that during the relevant time (1975-1979), rape was not yet applicable as an enumerated crime under crimes against humanity. The Pre-Trial Chamber agreed that during that time period rape was not a crime in its own, but ruled that the facts described as rape can be subsumed as ‘other inhumane acts’. Accordingly, on 13 January 2011, the Pre-Trial Chamber struck rape as a crime against humanity from the indictment. On 22 September 2011 the Trial Chamber severed Case 002 in two trials. The first trial of Case 002 was limited to forced transfers of the population. The second trial of Case 002 includes forced marriage and rape (nationwide) as crimes against humanity. Trial hearings in Case 002/02 commenced on 17 October 2014 and the presentation of evidence started on 8 January 2015. The proceedings against Ieng Sary were, however, terminated on 14 March 2013, following his death the same day.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    Case 002

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    SCSL - Charles Ghankay Taylor

    Year
    2013
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Modes of Liability
    Country
    Sierra Leone
    Keywords
    Forced Marriage Aiding and Abetting Superior Responsibility Conjugal Slavery AFRC RUF

    Reference link
    http://www.rscsl.org/Taylor.html
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL)
    Name of accused
    Charles Ghankay Taylor
    Charges
    Taylor faced an eleven count indictment, including; - crimes against humanity of rape and sexual slavery - war crime of outrages upon personal dignity. -war crime of committing acts of terror, carried out by, inter alia, sexual violence. He was not accused of carrying out these crimes himself; rather, he was charged with assisting and encouraging, acting in concert with, directing, controlling and/or being the superior of the Revolutionary United Front (RUF), the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council (AFRC), the joint RUF-AFRC junta and/or Liberian fighters.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 26 April 2012 the Trial Chamber found Taylor guilty on all eleven counts charged, including the charges that incorporated sexual violence crimes, as an aider and abettor of crimes committed by rebel forces in Sierra Leone.
    sentencing
    Taylor was sentenced to 50 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber, on 26 September 2013, upheld Taylor’s conviction and 50 years’ sentence.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    SCSL-03-01

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).