Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 1 to 10 of 34 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICC - Charles Ble Goude (“Laurent Gbagbo and Charles Ble Goude”)

    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Côte d’Ivoire
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Ordering/Instigating Post-election Violence Rape as Crime Against Humanity

    Reference link
    https://www.icc-cpi.int/EN_Menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/icc0211/related%20cases/icc-02_11-01_15/Pages/default.aspx
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Court
    Name of accused
    Charles Ble Goude
    Charges
    Ble Goude is accused, in the warrant of arrest (unsealed on 30 September 2013) of four counts of crimes against humanity, including: - Rape as a crime against humanity, allegedly committed in the context of post-electoral violence in Côte d'Ivoire between 16 December 2010 and 12 April 2011, as an indirect co-perpetrator pursuant to Article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute. In the Decision on the Confirmation of Charges of 11 December 2014, the following was confirmed: - Rape as a crime against humanity for the rape of at least 38 persons, committed by pro-Gbagbo forces. Ble Goude is responsible alternatively, as detailed below, under article 25(3)(a) (indirect co-perpetration), 25(3)(b) (ordering, soliciting or inducing), 25(3)(c) (aiding, abetting or otherwise assisting) or 25(3)(d) of the Statute: - under article 25(3)(a), (b), (c) or (d) of the Statute for the crime against humanity of the rape of at least 22 women committed on or around 12 April 2011 in Yopougon commune, Abidjan; - under article 25(3)(b), (c) or (d) of the Statute for the crime against humanity of the rape of at least 16 women and girls committed between 16 and 19 December 2010 during and after the pro-Ouattara march heading to the RTI headquarters.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 11 March 2015, Trial Chamber I joined his case and the one of Laurent Gbagbo in order to ensure the efficacy and expeditiousness of the proceedings. On 23 July 2018, Defence Counsel filed a “No case to answer motion” (“the Motion”) on grounds that the Prosecution had not adduced sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction. Following this motion, the Trial Chamber I of the ICC by majority, on 15 January 2019, acquitted Mr Laurent Gbagbo and Mr Charles Blé Goudé from all charges of crimes against humanity allegedly committed in Côte d'Ivoire in 2010 and 2011. The Chamber concluded after assessing the evidence that the Prosecutor had not furnished the court with sufficient evidence to establish the requisite elements for establishing the liability of Mr Gbagbo and Mr. Blé for the crimes charged.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Following an appeal by the Prosecutor, the Appeals chamber amended the conditions of release, although it stuck to the previous decision to acquit the accused from all charges. On 1 February 2019, the Appeals Chamber pronounced the conditions for the release of Mr Gbagbo and Mr Blé Goudé to a State that is willing to accept them on its territory and willing and able to enforce the conditions set by the Chamber and amended them on 21 February 2019.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    ICC-02/11-01/15

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR transfer - Ladislas Ntaganzwa

    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Amended Indictment Aiding and Abetting Interahamwe Ordering/Instigating Hostage

    Reference link
    http://www.unmict.org/en/cases/mict-12-21
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of accused
    Ladislas Ntaganzwa
    Charges
    Ntaganzwa is charged with sexual violence crimes (in the second amended indictment of 30 March 2012) as follows: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (committing, ordering and instigating, and aiding and abetting) and 6(3) (command responsibility). - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (committing, ordering and instigating, and aiding and abetting) and 6(3) (command responsibility). The underlying facts that relate to the sexual violence for all these charges concern: (i) at a date in early May 1994, at the Ryabidandi roadblock, Ryabidandi cellule, Nyagisozi secteur, Nyakizu commune, Ntaganzwa instructed and prompted a group of about eight JDR, interahamwe, and Hutu and Twa civilians to rape a Tutsi woman named Astorie (last name unknown). Acting on the direct instructions and the prompting of Ntaganzwa, Astorie was repeatedly raped during the night at a residence close to the Judicial Police Inspector’s residence within Ryabidandi cellule; (ii) On or about the day after this event, Ntaganzwa instructed and prompted a certain Habib, a Hutu civilian, to rape ARH, a Tutsi woman. Following Ntaganzwa’s instructions and prompting, Habib took ARH hostage and repeatedly raped her for a period of approximately 2 months.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    MICT-12-21

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR transfer - Ryandikayo

    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Accused at large Aiding and Abetting Ordering/Instigating Interahamwe

    Reference link
    http://unictr.irmct.org/en/cases/ictr-95-1e
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of accused
    Ryandikayo
    Charges
    Ryandikayo is charged with sexual violence crimes (in the second amended indictment of 8 May 2012) as follows: - Genocide for harming, including by raping, under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). [NB. Only 2(3)(a) is charged, not 2(3)(b), even though rape is mentioned for the count of genocide] - Complicity in genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) (commission, JCE I, ordering and instigating, aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraph 24) (commission, JCE I, ordering, instigating and planning, and aiding and abetting in relation to the sexual violence charged in paragraphs 33 and 34). The underlying facts that relate to the sexual violence for all these charges concern: (i) Ryandikayo took Jacqueline Uwineza into his house in Mubuga where he raped her and then took her to his banana plantation where she was killed by Interahamwe who beat her with clubs and machetes on his instigation and prompting (paragraph 24); (ii) the leading of six Tutsi girls on foot to the Mubuga cemetery and raping them, on the instructions of, inter alia, Ryandikayo (paragraph 33); (iii) in the course of an attack at Mubuga Catholic church, Ryandikayo together with Interahamwe and armed Hutu civilians, who acted in accordance with Ryandikayo’s instructions, prompting, and plan, raped and killed other Tutsi girls who were in the parish. Among them was a girl by the name of Claudine who resided near the parish.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    MICT-12-22

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR transfer - Wenceslas Munyeshyaka

    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Rwanda, France
    Keywords
    Acquittal Aiding and Abetting Interahamwe In Absentia Priest

    Reference link
    Link 1 Link 2
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of accused
    Wenceslas Munyeshyaka
    Charges
    In the indictment of 2005, he was charged with: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for (i) (aiding and abetting) an Interahamwe to rape HH a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish; (ii) (aiding and abetting) an Interahamwe to rape BFY a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish; (iii) (committing) rape on GG a Tutsi civilian girl, in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish in Kigali city; (iv) (committing) rape on BB a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish in Kigali city; (v) (committing) rape on EE, a Tutsi civilian girl, in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish, Kigali city. - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for: (i) (committing) rape on GG a Tutsi civilian girl, in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish in Kigali city; (ii) (aiding and abetting) an Interahamwe to rape a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Sainte-Famille Parish, in Kigali city; (iii) (aiding and abetting) an Interahamwe to rape a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Sainte-Famille parish, in Kigali city; (iv) (committing) rape on a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Sainte-Famille Parish in Kigali city; (v) (committing) rape on EE, a Tutsi civilian girl, in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish, Kigali city; (vi) (committing) rape on FF a Tutsi civilian girl in the Presbyterian rooms at Ste. Famille parish in Kigali city. In addition, planning and joint criminal enterprise III are also mentioned in the indictment, in more general terms.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    MICT-13-45

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Goran Hadzic

    Issues
    Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Aiding and Abetting Detention Centers Ill-health Ordering/Instigating Psychological Impact

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/694/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Goran Hadzic
    Charges
    Hadzic is charged with sexual violence crimes in the indictment (of 22 July 2001) and includes persecution as a crime against humanity, torture as a crime against humanity, inhumane acts as crimes against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Articles 7(1) (committing in concert with others, planning, instigating, ordering, and/or aiding and abetting) and 7(3) (command responsibility) for imposing on Croat and other non-Serb civilian detainees living conditions in various detention facilities in the SAO SBWS characterized by, inter alia, inhumane treatment and constant physical and psychological assault, including sexual assault.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-75

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Anto Furundžija (“Lašva Valley”)

    Year
    2000
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Akayesu Penetration Coercion Forced Nudity Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Aiding and Abetting Co-perpetration

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/684/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Anto Furundžija
    Charges
    - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (co-perpetration) - Outrages upon personal dignity (including rape) as a violation of the laws or customs of war under Article 7(1) (aiding and abetting) for interrogating Witness A, who was naked, while Accused B rubbed his knife on Witness A’s inner thighs and threatened to cut out her private parts if she did not tell the truth in answer to the interrogation by Furundžija. Accused B then repeatedly raped Witness A in front of an audience of soldiers.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Furundžija was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 10 December 1998 of: - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Outrages upon personal dignity (including rape) as a violation of the laws or customs of war. Although Furundžija did not rape Witness A himself, the Trial Chamber found that his presence and continued interrogation of Witness A aided and abetted the crimes committed by Accused B.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 21 July 2000 affirmed the convictions made by the Trial Chamber.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-17/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dusko Tadic (“Prijedor”)

    Year
    2000
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Men
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Forced Oral Sex Mutilation Insufficient Evidence Gang Rape Aiding and Abetting Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/787/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dusko Tadic
    Charges
    - Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 7(1) (individual responsibility) (aiding and abetting) for forcing two prisoners to commit oral sexual acts and for forcing one prisoner to sexually mutilate another prisoner.- Persecution as a crime against humanity as far as the sexual violence crimes were concerned.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Tadic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 7 May 1997 of:- Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and inhumane acts as crimes against humanity Tadic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of:- Persecution as a crime against humanity as far as the sexual violence crimes were concerned. According to the Trial Chamber there was insufficient evidence regarding Tadic’s participation in sexual assault and torture inflicted through gang-rapes.
    sentencing
    Tadic was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment on 26 January 2000.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber found Tadic on 15 July 1999 additionally guilty of: - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime under Article 7(1) (individual responsibility) (aiding and abetting) for forcing two prisoners to commit oral sexual acts and for forcing one prisoner to sexually mutilate another prisoner as it was not established that the victims were protected persons. Thus, for the same acts as he was found guilty by the Trial Chamber.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-94-1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Jean-Paul Akayesu

    Year
    2001
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Forced Nudity Aiding and Abetting Ordering/Instigating Sexual Violence as Genocide Rape as Crime Against Humanity Akayesu

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-96-4
    Full reference
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu, Judgment, 1 June 2001, ICTR-96-4.
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Jean-Paul Akayesu
    Charges
    - Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for: i) the rape of Witness JJ by an Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (ii) multiple acts of rape of fifteen girls and women by numerous Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (iii) multiple acts of rape of ten girls and women by numerous Interahamwe (ordering, instigating and aiding and abetting); (iv) the rape of Witness OO by an Interahamwe named Antoine (ordering, instigating and aiding and abetting); (v) the rape of a woman by Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (vi) the rape of the younger sister of Witness NN by an Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); (vii) the multiple rapes of Alexia, wife of Ntereye, and her two nieces Louise and Nishimwe by Interahamwe (aiding and abetting); - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for: (i) the forced undressing of the wife of Tharcisse (aiding and abetting); (ii) the forced undressing and naked public marching of Chantal (ordering, instigating and aiding and abetting); and (iii) the forced undressing of Alexia, wife of Ntereye, and her two nieces Louise and Nishimwe and to have them perform exercises naked in public (aiding and abetting). - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (direct responsibility) for all of the above mentioned sexual violence acts (aiding and abetting). - Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular rape, degrading and humiliating treatment and indecent assault, as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime
    Trial chamber verdict
    Akayesu was found guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 2 September 1998) for a number of sexual violence crimes that took place in and around the Taba bureau communal: - Rape as a crime against humanity - Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide Akayesu was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular rape, degrading and humiliating treatment and indecent assault, as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime as the Trial Chamber found that it was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the acts perpetrated by Akayesu were committed in conjunction with the armed conflict.
    sentencing
    Akayesu received a single sentence of life imprisonment (for genocide he had received a sentence of life imprisonment; for rape as a crime against humanity 15 years’ imprisonment; and other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity 10 years’ imprisonment).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The sexual violence convictions by the Trial Chamber were upheld by the Appeals Chamber (on 1 June 2001).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-96-4

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dusko Sikirica (Sikirica et al. "Keraterm Camp")

    Year
    2001
    Issues
    Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Camp Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Aiding and Abetting Instigating Command Responsibility

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/775/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dusko Sikirica
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(3) (command responsibility) for sexual assault of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained at the Keraterm camp.- Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as war crimes under Articles 7(1) (instigating, committing or aiding and abetting) and 7(3) (command responsibility) for sexual assault of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained at the Keraterm camp.- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and complicity in genocide under Articles 7(1) and 7(3) for subjecting Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat detainees at Keraterm camp to rapes and sexual assault.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Sikirica entered a guilty plea on 19 September 2001 and was found guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity As Sikirica entered a guilty plea to persecution as a crime against humanity only, the other sexual violence charges were withdrawn. Sikirica was therefore found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as war crimes - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide and complicity in genocide
    sentencing
    Sikirica was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment by the Trial Chamber on 13 November 2001.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-8

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragoljub Kunarac (Kunarac et al. "Foca")

    Year
    2002
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Penetration Sexual Slavery Lack of Consent Aiding and Abetting Vagina Rape as Crime Against Humanity Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/712/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragoljub Kunarac
    Charges
    - Torture as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (committing and aiding and abetting) for: (i) taking FWS-75 and D.B. to his headquarters at Ulica Osmana Ðikica no. 16, where he raped D.B. and aided and abetted the gang-rape of FWS-75 by several soldiers; (ii) taking FWS-87, FWS-75, FWS-50 and D.B. to his headquarters at Ulica Osmana Ðikica no. 16, where he raped FWS-87 and aided and abetted the torture and rapes of FWS-87, FWS-75 and FWS-50 by soldiers; (iii) transferring FWS-95 from Partizan Sports Hall to his headquarters at Ulica Osmana Ðikica no. 16, where he raped her; (iv) taking FWS-87 to a room on the upper floor of Karaman’s house in Miljevina, where he raped her; (v) threatening to kill FWS-183 and her son while he tried to obtain information or a confession from FWS-183 concerning her alleged sending of messages to the Muslim forces and information about the whereabouts of her valuables and for raping her on that occasion; and (vi) raping FWS-191 and aiding and abetting the rape of FWS-186 by soldiers in an abandoned house in Trnovace.- Enslavement as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (committing and aiding and abetting) for the enslavement of FWS-186 and FWS-191 for a period of six months in a house in Trnovace and for treating them as his property.- Torture as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for taking FWS-48 and two other women to the Hotel Zelengora where he raped FWS-48 and for taking FWS-48 and FWS-95 to a house in the Donje Polje neighborhood where he raped FWS-48.- Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) for taking FWS-186, FWS-191 and J.G. from the house Ulica Osmana Ðikica no. 16 to the abandoned house of Halid Cedic in Trnovace, where they were raped, and for raping FWS-191 approximately 6 months and treating FWS-186 and FWS-191 as his personal property.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kunarac was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 22 February 2001 of: - Torture as a crime against humanity - Rape as a crime against humanity - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Enslavement as a crime against humanity Kunarac was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Torture as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity, torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime and rape as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for taking FWS-48 and two other women to the Hotel Zelengora where he raped FWS-48 and for taking FWS-48 and FWS-95 to a house in the Donje Polje neighborhood where he raped FWS-48. - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Kunarac received a sentence of 28 years’ imprisonment on 12 June 2002.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions by the Trial Chamber were upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 12 June 2002.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-96-23 and IT-96-23/1

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).