Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 41 to 50 of 67 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Zoran Zigic (“Kvocka et al.”)

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Cumulative Conviction Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Forced Nudity Forced to watch Rape Mental Harm Persecution on Sexual Grounds Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Zoran Zigic (“Kvocka et al.”)
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Zigic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE). Zigic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime.
    sentencing
    Zigic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 25 years’ imprisonment on 28 February 2005 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Although Zigic was initially found guilty by the Trial Chamber of persecution as a crime against humanity for the sexual violence crimes, this conviction was reversed by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Emmanuel Bagambiki ("Ntagerura et al.")

    Year
    2004
    Issues
    Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Amicus Curiae Withdrawal of Charges In Absentia Extradition

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-99-46
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Emmanuel Bagambiki
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-99-46

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dario Kordic (“Kordic & Cerkez”)

    Year
    2004
    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Unclear Indictment

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/705/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dario Kordic (“Kordic & Cerkez”)
    Charges
    - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime under Article 7(1) for the sexual assault of Witness TW21 in Vitez in April 1993, the rape in Nadioci, and the rape of Adina Jusic. - Persecution as a crime against humanity; - Wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime; - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime; - Violence to life and person as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime; - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime (another count than the one cited above); and - Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kordic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2001 of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime. Kordic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity; - Wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime; - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime; - Violence to life and person as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime; - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime (another count than the one cited above); and - Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime.
    sentencing
    Kordic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 25 years’ imprisonment on 17 December 2004 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber reversed Kordic’s convictions for sexual violence on 17 December 2004 – i.e. inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime – as it found that the incidents of sexual violence were not charged in the indictment or proved.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-14/2

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Mario Cerkez (“Kordic & Cerkez”)

    Year
    2004
    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Unclear Indictment

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/705/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Mario Cerkez (“Kordic & Cerkez”)
    Charges
    - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime under Article 7(1) for the sexual assault of Witness TW21 in Vitez in April 1993; - Persecution as a crime against humanity; - Wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime; - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime; - Violence to life and person as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime; - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime (another count than the one cited above); and - Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Cerkez was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 26 February 2001 of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime. Cerkez was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity; - Wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime; - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime; - Violence to life and person as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime; - Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime (another count than the one cited above); and - Cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime.
    sentencing
    Cerkez was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 6 years’ imprisonment on 17 December 2004 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber reversed Cerkez's conviction for sexual violence on 17 December 2004 – i.e. inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime – as it found that incidents of sexual violence were not charged in the indictment or not proved.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-14/2

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Tihomir Blaskic

    Year
    2004
    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Effective Control Cumulative Conviction

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/667/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Tihomir Blaskic
    Charges
    Inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime and cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(3) (command responsibility), which included rapes of Bosnian Muslims detained by the HVO in Rotilj village (Kiseljak municipality) and in Dubravica primary school (Vitez municipality) and committed by the HVO soldiers and Military Police.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Blaskic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 3 March 2000 for the sexual violence charges.
    sentencing
    Blaskic was sentenced to 9 years’ imprisonment on 29 July 2004 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 29 July 2004 dismissed both convictions as the cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime conviction was considered to be an impermissible cumulative conviction, while the inhuman treatment as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime could not be sustained since Blaskic was held not have exercised effective control over his subordinates responsible for the rapes.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-14

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Kosovo UNMIK and EULEX - Milos Jokic

    Year
    2002
    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Kosovo
    Keywords
    Acquittal Credibility or Character of the Victim Genocidal Rape

    Reference link
    http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbs-acquitted-of-war-rapes-in-kosovo
    Type of mechanism
    District Court
    Name of mechanism
    Gjilan/Gnjilane District Court
    Name of accused
    Milos Jokic
    Charges
    Jokic was charged with genocide, including with: - the rape of a Kosovo Albanian female on 30 May 1999. On the first day of trial the prosecutor filed an amended indictment which included this allegation of rape.
    Trial chamber verdict
    The trial took place in Gjilan/Gnjilane District Court, between 15 May and 20 September 2000, before a majority local panel (with one international judge), and with a local public prosecutor, which convicted Jokic of war crimes, including rape, FRY Criminal Code 142, and sentenced him to 20 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 26 April 2001 the Supreme Court reversed the conviction on the grounds that the District Court had failed to consider the evidence carefully and had failed to call Defense witnesses. The case was remanded back to the Gjilan/Gnjilane District Court. A majority international UNMIK panel and an international UNMIK prosecutor handled the retrial of the case. On 3 May 2002, the panel found Jokic not guilty on all counts on the grounds that the eye-witness identification was not credible.
    Status
    2715

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Alfred Musema

    Year
    2001
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Crimes Against Humanity Genocidal Rape Mutilation

    Reference link
    http://www.unictr.org/en/cases/ictr-96-13
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Alfred Musema
    Charges
    Causing serious bodily and mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (committing and aiding and abetting), including raping a young Tutsi woman named Nyiramusugi, and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (committing) for raping Nyiramusugi.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Musema was convicted by the Trial Chamber (on 27 January 2000) for causing serious bodily and mental harm as genocide.
    sentencing
    The Appeals Chamber confirmed the sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions were reversed on appeal. The Appeals Chamber heard out-of-court statements of Witnesses CB and EB. It held that if these testimonies had been available at trial, there would have been a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Musema with respect to the rape of Nyiramusugi. It thus found Alfred Musema not guilty of rape as a crime against humanity but affirmed the verdict of culpability for genocide and extermination as crime against humanity.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-96-13

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Zejnil Delalic (Mucic et al. "Celebici Camp")

    Year
    2001
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Prior Sexual Conduct Akayesu

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/676/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Zejnil Delalic
    Charges
    Delalic was charged with sexual violence as war crimes under Article 7(3) (command responsibility) – see the case of Zdravko Mucic for the crimes he was charged with as well (and even more).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Delalic was acquitted by the Trial Chamber of all charges on 16 November 1998, thus the sexual violence charges included, because it was not established that he had superior responsibility over Celebici prison-camp, its commander, deputy commander or guards.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Delalic’s acquittal on all charges was affirmed by the Appeals Chamber on 20 February 2001.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-96-21

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    US Military Commission at Yokohama - General Soemu Toyoda

    Year
    1949
    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Japan
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility

    Reference link
    http://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:/80444/xv58850
    Type of mechanism
    Military Commission
    Name of mechanism
    US Military Commission in Tokyo
    Name of accused
    General Soemu Toyoda
    Charges
    Toyoda was charged with several war crimes, including rape, under command responsibility.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Toyoda was found not guilty and acquitted on 6 September 1949.
    Status
    2715

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Aloys Ntabakuze (Bagasora et al. “Military I”)

    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Crimes Against Humanity Genocide Sexual Violence Tutsi War Crimes Rape as Crime Against Humanity

    Reference link
    Click here
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Aloys Ntabakuze
    Charges
    Ntabakuze had been charged with sexual violence crimes: i.e. conspiracy to commit genocide, genocide, complicity in genocide, rape as a crime against humanity, persecution as a crime against humanity, other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, violence to health and to the physical or mental well-being of civilians as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, rape and indecent assault as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for: (i) rapes, sexual assaults and other crimes of a sexual nature committed against Tutsi women and girls throughout Rwanda, including at the secondary nursing school in Kabgayi, in Gitarama prefecture;(ii) the sexual assault of Prime Minister Agathe Uwilingiyimana
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ntabakuze was found not guilty for the sexual violence crimes under these counts by the Trial Chamber (on 18 December 2008).
    sentencing
    Ntabakuze was given a sentence of 35 years’ imprisonment on 8 May 2012 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The acquittal for the sexual violence was not appealed by the Prosecution.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-41

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).