Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 51 to 60 of 67 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Emmanuel Bagambiki (Ntagerura et al. “Cyangugu”)

    Issues
    Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Amicus Curiae Extradition

    Reference link
    http://www.unictr.org/en/cases/ictr-99-46
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Emmanuel Bagambiki
    Charges
    Sexual violence and rape
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Chief Prosecutor announced that she would add charges of sexual violence in the indictment or bring a separate indictment on sexual violence crimes only, but the Chamber refused to grant leave to file the amicus curiae brief. Bagambiki was acquitted on 25 February 2004 (on all charges).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-99-46

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Emmanuel Bagambiki ("Ntagerura et al.")

    Year
    2004
    Issues
    Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Amicus Curiae Withdrawal of Charges In Absentia Extradition

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-99-46
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Emmanuel Bagambiki
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-99-46

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Casimir Bizimungu (Bizimungu et al. “Government II”)

    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Crimes Against Humanity Genocide Prevention Tutsi War Crimes

    Reference link
    Click here
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Casimir Bizimungu
    Charges
    Bizimungu was charged with sexual violence as follows:Genocide or, alternatively, complicity in genocide and rape as a crime against humanity as well as outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as war crimes under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for failing to prevent or to punish the rapes of Tutsi women and students committed by soldiers and Interahamwe at the secondary nursing school in Kabgayi in Gitarama prefecture.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Mid-trial, in 2005, Bizimungu was acquitted of the sexual violence charges due to a lack of evidence (See the Decision on Defense Motions Pursuant to Rule 98bis).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Bizimungu was acquitted by the Trial Chamber on 30 September 2011 (on all counts).
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-99-50

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Augustin Ngirabatware

    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Rape as Crime Against Humanity

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-99-54
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Augustin Ngirabatware
    Charges
    Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ngirabatware was found guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 20 December 2012) for rape as a crime against humanity. The Trial Chamber held that based on the totality of the evidence, it was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that at the time Ngirabatware distributed weapons to the Interahamwe, including members of the JCE, and verbally encouraged them to kill Tutsis on 7 April 1994, Ngirabatware was aware of the possible consequence that those Interahamwe, including members of the JCE, might rape Tutsis as part of a widespread and systematic attack against the Tutsi population. By distributing the weapons, Ngirabatware significantly contributed to the JCE and demonstrated his willingness to take the risk that the rape of Tutsis, such as Chantal Murazemariya, would be committed. Accordingly, Ngirabatware was criminally responsible through a JCE in the extended form for the repeated rape of Chantal Murazemariya by Juma and Makuze in Nyamyumba commune in April 1994 as a crime against humanity. [Note that the rapes of Bonishance and Denise Nyirabunori - also charged in the indictment - were not established on the basis of the evidence presented by the Prosecution according to the Trial Chamber]
    sentencing
    Ngirabatware was sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment on 18 December 2014 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber, however, acquitted Ngirabatware for this crime (on 18 December 2014). It observed that Ngirabatware’s contribution to the common purpose to exterminate the Tutsi civilian population was essential for establishing his responsibility for crimes committed beyond the common purpose, but which are nevertheless a natural and foreseeable consequence thereof. Since the Prosecution failed to prove Ngirabatware’s contribution to the common purpose of exterminating the Tutsi civilian population pleaded under Count 5 of the Indictment, Ngirabatware’s conviction for rape entered via the extended form of joint criminal enterprise under Count 6 of the Indictment cannot be sustained. For the foregoing reasons, the Appeals Chamber granted, in part, Ngirabatware’s Third Ground of Appeal, reversed his conviction for the rape of Chantal Murazemariya, and entered a verdict of acquittal under Count 6 of the Indictment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-99-54

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Andre Rwamakuba

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Severance of Charges

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-98-44c
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Andre Rwamakuba
    Charges
    When Rwamakuba was jointly indicted with three co-Accused, all were charged with conspiracy to commit genocide, direct and public incitement to genocide, genocide, or alternatively complicity in genocide, rape and extermination as crimes against humanity, and serious violations of Article 3 Common to the Geneva Conventions under Articles 6(1) and 6(3).
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Prosecution requested a severance of the trial and then charged Rwamakuba with genocide, complicity in genocide, and murder and extermination as crimes against humanity; thus no longer with sexual violence. Rwamakuba is acquitted on all counts on 20 September 2006.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-44C

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Anatole Nsengiyumva (Bagasora et al. “Military I”)

    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Genocide Inhuman Treatment Tutsi War Crimes Rape as Crime Against Humanity

    Reference link
    Click here
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Anatole Nsengiyumva
    Charges
    Nsengiyumva had been charged with sexual violence crimes - i.e. conspiracy to commit genocide, genocide, complicity in genocide, rape as a crime against humanity, persecution as a crime against humanity, other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, violence to health and to the physical or mental well-being of civilians as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, rape and indecent assault as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for: (i) rapes, sexual assaults and other crimes of a sexual nature committed against Tutsi women and girls in various locations in Gisenyi, including at Nyundo parish.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Nsengiyumva was found not guilty for the sexual violence crimes under these counts by the Trial Chamber (on 18 December 2008).
    sentencing
    Nsengiyumva was sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment on 14 December 2011 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The acquittal for the sexual violence was not appealed by the Prosecution.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-41

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Aloys Ntabakuze (Bagasora et al. “Military I”)

    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Command Responsibility Crimes Against Humanity Genocide Sexual Violence Tutsi War Crimes Rape as Crime Against Humanity

    Reference link
    Click here
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Aloys Ntabakuze
    Charges
    Ntabakuze had been charged with sexual violence crimes: i.e. conspiracy to commit genocide, genocide, complicity in genocide, rape as a crime against humanity, persecution as a crime against humanity, other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, violence to health and to the physical or mental well-being of civilians as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, rape and indecent assault as a violation of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II as a war crime under Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for: (i) rapes, sexual assaults and other crimes of a sexual nature committed against Tutsi women and girls throughout Rwanda, including at the secondary nursing school in Kabgayi, in Gitarama prefecture;(ii) the sexual assault of Prime Minister Agathe Uwilingiyimana
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ntabakuze was found not guilty for the sexual violence crimes under these counts by the Trial Chamber (on 18 December 2008).
    sentencing
    Ntabakuze was given a sentence of 35 years’ imprisonment on 8 May 2012 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The acquittal for the sexual violence was not appealed by the Prosecution.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-41

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Alfred Musema

    Year
    2001
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Crimes Against Humanity Genocidal Rape Mutilation

    Reference link
    http://www.unictr.org/en/cases/ictr-96-13
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Alfred Musema
    Charges
    Causing serious bodily and mental harm as genocide under Article 6(1) (committing and aiding and abetting), including raping a young Tutsi woman named Nyiramusugi, and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (committing) for raping Nyiramusugi.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Musema was convicted by the Trial Chamber (on 27 January 2000) for causing serious bodily and mental harm as genocide.
    sentencing
    The Appeals Chamber confirmed the sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The convictions were reversed on appeal. The Appeals Chamber heard out-of-court statements of Witnesses CB and EB. It held that if these testimonies had been available at trial, there would have been a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Musema with respect to the rape of Nyiramusugi. It thus found Alfred Musema not guilty of rape as a crime against humanity but affirmed the verdict of culpability for genocide and extermination as crime against humanity.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-96-13

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICC - Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui

    Year
    2015
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
    Keywords
    Acquittal Insufficient Evidence Forced Marriage Forced Nudity Severance of Charges Withdrawal of Charges

    Reference link
    https://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200104/related%20cases/ICC-01-04-02-12/Pages/default.aspx
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Court
    Name of accused
    Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui
    Charges
    Initially, Chui was charged (together with Katanga) with crimes against humanity and war crimes, including sexual slavery, committed on 24 February 2003 during the attack on the village of Bogoro, in the Ituri district of the DRC. Although subsequent events resulted in withdrawal of the sexual slavery counts as evidence from two victims/witnesses of sexual violence substantiating these counts was excluded by the Court because of security concerns, a change in their security situation made it possible for the Prosecutor to reinstate the sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and a war crime counts and add charges of rape as a crime against humanity and a war crime as well as outrages upon personal dignity as a war crime on 12 June 2008 (Prosecution’s Submission, 12 June 2008). According to the amended document containing the charges, in its section elaborating on ‘sexual offences’ (Prosecution's Amended Document, 12 June 2008, para. 89): “women, who were captured at Bogoro and spared because they hid their ethnicity, were raped, sexually enslaved or humiliated. Threatened with death by the combatants, one woman was stripped and forced to parade half naked in front of them. Others were raped and forcibly taken to military camps. Once there, they were sometimes given as a ‘wife’ to their captors or kept in the camp’s prison, which was a hole dug in the ground. The women detained in these prisons were repeatedly raped by soldiers and commanders alike and also by soldiers who were punished and sent to prison. The fate reserved to captured women was widely known. Shortly after the Bogoro attack, KATANGA saw one of the imprisoned women detained in such conditions in one of the FRPI camps.” On 30 September 2008, the Chamber confirmed the charges against Chui (and Katanga) for rape and sexual slavery as crimes against humanity and war crimes under Article 25(3)(a), but declined to confirm the charge of outrages upon personal dignity as a war crime as, the Chamber held, the link to the suspect was lacking (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, 30 September 2008). On 21 November 2012, the Court severed the charges against Katanga and Chui.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 18 December 2012, Trial Chamber II acquitted Chui of the charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity. It was found not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Chui was the commander of the Lendu combatants during the attack on Bogoro in Ituri, Eastern DRC on 24 February 2003, as charged by the ICC. Rather, the evidence supported the finding that he held the role of a commander in March 2003, after the February attack on Bogoro.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 21 December 2012, Chui was released from custody. On 27 February 2015, the Appeals Chamber confirmed, by majority, Trial Chamber II’s decision of 18 December 2012 acquitting Chui.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICC-01/04-02/12

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICC - Germain Katanga

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability Sentencing and Reparations Procedural Rules Advancing Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
    Keywords
    Acquittal Common Purpose Forced Marriage Forced Nudity Definition of Rape Withdrawal of Charges Severance of Charges

    Reference link
    https://www.icc-cpi.int/drc/katanga
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Court
    Name of accused
    Germain Katanga
    Charges
    Initially, Katanga was charged (together with Chui) with crimes against humanity and war crimes, including sexual slavery, committed on 24 February 2003 during the attack on the village of Bogoro, in the Ituri district of the DRC. Although subsequent events resulted in withdrawal of the sexual slavery counts as evidence from two victims/witnesses of sexual violence substantiating these counts was excluded by the Court because of security concerns, a change in their security situation made it possible for the Prosecutor to reinstate the sexual slavery as a crime against humanity and a war crime counts and add charges of rape as a crime against humanity and a war crime as well as outrages upon personal dignity as a war crime on 12 June 2008 (Prosecution’s Submission, 12 June 2008). According to the amended document containing the charges, in its section elaborating on ‘sexual offences’ (Prosecution’s Amended Document, 12 June 2008, para. 89): “women, who were captured at Bogoro and spared because they hid their ethnicity, were raped, sexually enslaved or humiliated. Threatened with death by the combatants, one woman was stripped and forced to parade half naked in front of them. Others were raped and forcibly taken to military camps. Once there, they were sometimes given as a ‘wife’ to their captors or kept in the camp’s prison, which was a hole dug in the ground. The women detained in these prisons were repeatedly raped by soldiers and commanders alike and also by soldiers who were punished and sent to prison. The fate reserved to captured women was widely known. Shortly after the Bogoro attack, KATANGA saw one of the imprisoned women detained in such conditions in one of the FRPI camps.” On 30 September 2008, the Chamber confirmed the charges against Katanga (and Chui) for rape and sexual slavery as crimes against humanity and war crimes under Article 25(3)(d), but declined to confirm the charge of outrages upon personal dignity as a war crime as, the Chamber held, the link to the suspect was lacking (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, 30 September 2008). On 21 November 2012, the Court severed the charges against Katanga and Chui.
    Trial chamber verdict
    The Judgement against Katanga was pronounced on 7 March 2014 and although he was convicted for several other crimes against humanity and war crimes under Article 25(3)(d), he was acquitted for the sexual violence charges. The Chamber unanimously found Katanga not guilty of contributing to the acts of sexual violence as they did not believe these crimes formed part of the common purpose of the attack, unlike the crimes of directing an attack against a civilian population, pillage, murder and destruction of property as war crimes/crimes against humanity.
    sentencing
    A total sentence of 12 years’ imprisonment was given on 23 May 2014 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 13 November 2015, a Panel of three Judges of the Appeals Chamber, specifically appointed by the Appeals Chamber, reviewed Katanga’s sentence and decided to reduce it. Accordingly, the date for the completion of his sentence was set to 18 January 2016. Decisions on possible victim reparations, which might have an impact on victims of sexual violence, will be rendered later.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICC-01/04-01/07

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).